<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss">
	<channel>
		<title>rkuzdas on eBaums World</title>
		<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/rkuzdas</link>
		<description>Latest media uploaded to eBaums World by rkuzdas</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 22:02:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 22:02:51 -0400</pubDate>
				<item>
			<guid>1043445</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 14:16:29 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				-Who are the voters-			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/1043445/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-11-02 14:16:29<br />
							<p>This will most likely be my last political blog for this election, (I might throw something in on election day), I have a hell of alot of Studying to catch up on, as I've practicly said "Fuck it" for the last month to work on the Obama Campaign here at the University.&nbsp; Anyways, this will be politically neutral, as I'm only curious as to the makeup of the voters here on ebaums.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If you care too, respond with the following information-</p>
<p>- What state you reside in, and whether you live in an Urban (Small and large cities) or Rurual area. (Townships and countryside)</p>
<p>- What your occupation is, how much you earn (Be truthful, most of you do NOT earn more then 30k and still hang out on ebaums for 4-6 hours a day).</p>
<p>- Who your voting for, whether you will be voting a straight ticket, or splitting your vote on a local level.</p>
<p>- Your reasons for voting for YOUR candidate. If voting for the "Lesser of Two Evils", then explain why, but do not go on an onslaught of attacking the other candidate, as that is nothing more then a lack of motivation and proof you're too lazy to research the candidates.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Heres mine,</p>
<p>Wisconsin, Urban (Small city).&nbsp; Current Student, education and living expenses paid through GIBILL and Wisconsin GiBill, which gives me roughly $1,500 a month.&nbsp; I'll be voting Obama/Biden, but am undecided between the Local Representatives for State Assembly, Kauffert, a Moderate Republican, and small business owner and Westphal, a staunch Liberal, and retired Laborer and union man.&nbsp; And I'm voting for Obama because I believe he is both better suited through a diverse array of both abilities and experiences to run the nation in its current state, as well as his plans for Health care, Economic reform, as well as his progressive Diplomacy. &nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Oh, and as a footnote, if you are not old enough to vote, not planning on voting, or unable to vote because you are either a foreign national, citizen, or Felon... please ignore this blog and do not post, as it doesn't apply to you.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/1043445/</link>
			<media:title type="html">-Who are the voters-</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/1043445/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;This will most likely be my last political blog for this election, (I might throw something in on election day), I have a hell of alot of Studying to catch up on, as I've practicly said &quot;Fuck it&quot; for the last month to work on the Obama Campaign here at the University.&amp;nbsp; Anyways, this will be politically neutral, as I'm only curious as to the makeup of the voters here on ebaums.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you care too, respond with the following information-&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- What state you reside in, and whether you live in an Urban (Small and large cities) or Rurual area. (Townships and countryside)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- What your occupation is, how much you earn (Be truthful, most of you do NOT earn more then 30k and still hang out on ebaums for 4-6 hours a day).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Who your voting for, whether you will be voting a straight ticket, or splitting your vote on a local level.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Your reasons for voting for YOUR candidate. If voting for the &quot;Lesser of Two Evils&quot;, then explain why, but do not go on an onslaught of attacking the other candidate, as that is nothing more then a lack of motivation and proof you're too lazy to research the candidates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Heres mine,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wisconsin, Urban (Small city).&amp;nbsp; Current Student, education and living expenses paid through GIBILL and Wisconsin GiBill, which gives me roughly $1,500 a month.&amp;nbsp; I'll be voting Obama/Biden, but am undecided between the Local Representatives for State Assembly, Kauffert, a Moderate Republican, and small business owner and Westphal, a staunch Liberal, and retired Laborer and union man.&amp;nbsp; And I'm voting for Obama because I believe he is both better suited through a diverse array of both abilities and experiences to run the nation in its current state, as well as his plans for Health care, Economic reform, as well as his progressive Diplomacy. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh, and as a footnote, if you are not old enough to vote, not planning on voting, or unable to vote because you are either a foreign national, citizen, or Felon... please ignore this blog and do not post, as it doesn't apply to you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>991688</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:08:50 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				Barracuda- The Political History of Sarah Palin			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/991688/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-10-11 01:08:50<br />
							<p><strong>As a warning, this is incredibly long.&nbsp; We all know that Sarah Palin was the governor and then VP pick for her home state of Alaska, but how did she get there?&nbsp; Here is an unbiased view at Sarah Palin, the self Proclaimed Hockey Mom, supporter of Joe Six-pack, and VP pick for McCain the Maverick.</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><br />It's unlikely the name Sarah Palin would mean much to anyone if not for a man named Nick Carney. Long before she stood up to Republican cronies and "the good old boys" of Alaska, Palin stood up to Carney, a colleague on Wasilla's city council. As Kaylene Johnson explains in her sympathetic biography, Sarah, Carney had the gall to propose an ordinance giving his own company the city contract for garbage removal. In Johnson's telling, it was the first time Palin bravely spoke truth to power: "'I said no and I voted no,' Sarah said. 'People should have the choice about whether or not to haul their garbage to the dump.'" Johnson writes that Palin's vote made Carney into a "political enemy"--the first of many, it turns out.<br /><br />The episode might serve as a compelling, if small-bore, example of Palin's reformer instincts. Except that, according to those who were present, Carney wasn't quite the crooked trash magnate Palin makes him out to be. For one thing, Carney couldn't have proposed the ordinance because he'd recused himself from the matter. The council, in fact, had asked him to appear as a kind of expert witness on the relevant rules and regulations. "I looked at it as we actually had an expert on the council sharing the information," recalls Laura Chase, a fellow councilwoman. "Not ... conspiring over a contract. There was no way that was happening."<br /><br />So if it wasn't a sinister garbage conspiracy that put Carney in Palin's crosshairs, what was it? At first glance, the two would have appeared to be allies--both had spent most of their lives in Wasilla and had attended the same high school. But, beyond that, they were sociological opposites in almost every respect. Whereas Palin had bounced around several no-name colleges before graduating from the University of Idaho, Carney held a degree from Dartmouth. Palin seemed preoccupied with her family and church when she entered politics. Carney was preoccupied with histories of the Civil War and World War II (he later contributed a self-published book to the genre) and savored the New York Times crossword puzzle. By the time he joined the city council, Carney had traveled to Asia, Australia, and Central America. He'd run the Anchorage office of Alaska's economic development agency and had served as the state's agriculture director. "I'd dealt with larger budgets by far than the city of Wasilla," he recently told me.<br /><br />Carney had a wry sense of humor. He was fond of joking that he'd graduated from Wasilla High School in the "top 20 percent"--by which he meant he was valedictorian of his five-person class. Sometimes Palin was the only colleague who didn't get his jokes. "I don't think he had too much patience for her lack of understanding," says John Stein, then the town's mayor. In internal discussions, Carney would be relentlessly logical while Palin was vague and intuitive. "Nick had a way of being direct and to the point, something that Sarah was uncomfortable with," recalls Chase. Which is to say, when it came to garbage removal, what Palin seemed to have chafed against was less the substance of Carney's position than what she felt was his elitist, Ivy League bearing. And, over the next few years, she found ways to get him back.<br /><br />These days, Palin is engaged in this same fight against elites, though on a considerably larger stage. "I'm not one of those who maybe came from a background of, you know, kids who perhaps graduate college and their parents give them a passport and give them a backpack and say go off and travel the world," she recently told Katie Couric. "No, I've worked all my life." That hardly makes her the first politician to run on class resentments--nearly every conservative from George W. Bush to Mitt Romney has sought a bond with voters by attacking the over-educated and entitled. But more often than not these conservatives are elites themselves; hence the spectacle of Yale legacies and Harvard millionaires (and most of the Fox News executive suite) railing against wine-swilling sophisticates.<br /><br />Palin, by contrast, may be the first conservative politician since Nixon to experience resentment so authentically. For her, it's not so much a political tool as a motivating principle. A trip through Palin's past reveals that almost every step of her career can be understood as a reaction to elitist condescension--much of it in her own mind.<br />&nbsp;<br /><br />Before he became her enemy, Nick Carney was actually Palin's mentor--though, like John McCain, his reasons for championing her had much to do with his own political agenda. In the early '90s, Carney and a group of local business leaders decided the city needed a sales tax to fund public services--such as a police force--it could no longer live without. To advance this position in an area not exactly teeming with Great Society liberals, they'd formed a group called "Watch on Wasilla" and persuaded John Stein, then the mayor, to embrace their cause. Carney won his seat on the city council in 1992 on the back of these efforts.<br /><br />Heading into that election, Carney and Stein realized their program would go nowhere if they couldn't connect with what you might call Wal-Mart moms--that great mass of voters too busy earning a living and raising their families to follow local politics. "We were lacking lines of communication between the council as it existed and the younger bloc of voters in town," recalls Carney. "We didn't have anyone on there who worked [as a laborer] for a living or who was a housewife."<br /><br />Carney's daughter had gone to high school with Palin; Stein and his wife knew her from an aerobics class they attended. She seemed bright and energetic and had a winning way about her--the same qualities McCain would notice 15 years later. They invited her to attend a "Watch on Wasilla" meeting and, after a brief interview, asked her to run on their moderate plank. Carney introduced her to local business leaders and campaigned alongside her. "I took her around . .. and said, 'This is a person who supports our points of view. She'll do what she can to make the police force run.' And she did it." It was a bit like Palin's convention rollout in miniature, and the initial effect was similar. Palin breezed into office with Carney that October.<br /><br />Palin's first year or two on the council went smoothly by all accounts. "I was relatively pleased at the fact that she did communicate back and forth to that group," Carney says. "She would make good decisions." But, in retrospect, there were signs of tension. Though council members routinely bickered with one another, Palin became defensive when she was on the receiving end. "Sarah is intimidated, in my personal opinion, by people who are intelligent," Laura Chase says.<br /><br />The city had traditionally put up part of the purse for the Iron Dog competition--the grueling, 2,000-mile snow machine race that usually starts in Wasilla--and one year the council considered upping its ante. (First prize could be tens of thousands of dollars.) When a colleague pointed out that Palin should recuse herself because her husband was a perennial Iron Dog contender, she protested, "I don't think I have a conflict of interest here because Todd won it last year. There's no guarantee that he's going to win it this year." As others chimed in to explain the problem, Palin dug in her heels. "Well, it could be perceived that way, but it isn't," she harrumphed.<br /><br />As a rule, the city's department heads attended every city council meeting. One evening, as the session wound down, Palin mentioned to Mary Ellen Emmons, the library director, that something had been bothering her--a book she thought was overly indulgent of homosexuality. "She said there was no room in our library for that kind of stuff," recalls Chase. Emmons curtly disagreed, but Palin was adamant. She suggested the librarian could at least keep such books in the reference section, where visitors would have to request them. "We don't believe in censoring books," Emmons finally told her, at which point Palin trailed off muttering.<br /><br />Palin also butted heads at times with Dick Deuser, the city attorney. Deuser was not your average small-town lawyer. He'd attended law school at the University of Minnesota and had worked for a prominent Anchorage firm. At one point, the council asked him about the legality of banning group homes--such as shelters for runaways--a position Palin championed. Deuser had an academic manner and was fond of citing Supreme Court precedent. When he explained that a ban would be unconstitutional, Palin appeared impatient with such legal niceties. "I would describe it this way: Sarah was not an in-depth person. Never has, never will be," Deuser says. "Her instincts are political as opposed to evaluative."<br /><br />&nbsp;That Palin would feel threatened by the more urbane members of the community is no surprise given her upbringing. Late one September morning in Wasilla, I met a high school classmate of Palin's named Perry Cowles, a warm, scruffy- looking man with a soul patch and hipster glasses. Cowles overhauls hot rods for a living, and his shop sits at the front of a three-acre lot. A few hundred yards back is his residence, which he described to me as "a typical Alaska house: seven hundred feet of living space; five thousand feet of garage space."<br /><br />For lunch, Cowles took me to a restaurant near the top of Hatcher Pass, a fearsome peak from which, on a clear day, you can see the Knik River off in the distance. He flipped through his high school yearbook while we ate. Almost every page reminded him of another classmate who'd passed away--one who died when his prop-jet crashed, another who drowned in a lake. I got the sense life in small-town Alaska was somehow more precarious than in the lower 48.<br /><br />Or, for that matter, in Anchorage. Though it's only 45 miles away, Anchorage can feel like an alternate universe--a far more affluent and cosmopolitan one at that. In Wasilla, the resentment has sometimes been intense. Cowles had been a hockey player in high school. In those days, the town had a single outdoor rink, which he and his teammates would mop after games and practices. He jokingly recalled how the Anchorage teams would show up in their parents' new cars wearing $200 skates "while we had tennis shoes with butter knives." "I'll never forget--we had a game with a team we were outmatched against," Cowles told me. "Our coach said, 'We can't win. But you go out there and I want blood. I want you to teach these rich kids a lesson.' And we did."<br /><br />Palin nursed a milder form of this grievance as a high school basketball player. When Palin's coach, Don Teeguarden, arrived at the school in 1976, there were only 300 students and the team was abysmal. To improve, Teeguarden scheduled the powerful Anchorage teams, which, he told me, "was a pretty easy sell" for a no-name like Wasilla. By the time Palin was playing for him a few years later, the Wasilla girls had improved significantly--becoming a state power in their own right--but they still sometimes struggled to be taken seriously. "It was easy to put that small school chip on our shoulder," says Teeguarden. "If an Anchorage school came to Wasilla and we won, it was like it didn't count because they had to travel forty miles. To really get much respect from the Anchorage press, we had to go into town and win."<br /><br />Palin's church, the Wasilla Assembly of God, also marked her as an outsider. The modern Pentecostal tradition traces its roots to a grassroots religious fervor at the start of the twentieth century. In the ensuing decades, followers tended to be less educated and affluent than their Protestant brethren. The tradition is also more democratic, in that it emphasizes a direct connection with Christ through the Holy Spirit. Hence the Pentecostal practice of speaking in tongues (in which congregants are moved by the Holy Spirit to speak in unfamiliar languages) and the laying on of hands (in which congregants invoke the Holy Spirit and heal one another with their touch).<br /><br />Paul Riley, the church's founding pastor, personally epitomized the overlay of religion and class in Wasilla. Since Riley's work as a minister wasn't lucrative enough to support his family, he spent years moonlighting as a school bus driver while his wife worked in the post office. He sometimes endured the sneering of local elites. In 1980, he decided to construct a building large enough to house a 1,000-member church--a far bigger flock than he had at the time. It was a massive undertaking that took four years to complete and required $1 million in capital, even with the help of dozens of volunteers from around the country. "I had one banker that was concerned about me," Riley told me. "He said, 'What'll happen if you can't pay back the loan?' I said, 'We'll be here when you're gone.' The honest truth: He was gone before the church was finished. The bank went belly-up. ... I just felt in my own heart that God was giving us direction."</p>
<p>Against this backdrop, Palin suffered her own petty slights and indignities. Growing up, she'd been pushed to great lengths by her hard-charging father, Chuck Heath. Heath had competed in the Boston Marathon and would lead his brood on grueling runs through the Mat-Su Valley. He had exacting standards for his children, sometimes higher than his daughter could deliver on. Palin was, according to classmates, an above-average basketball player, but hardly a star. Even as a junior, she found herself languishing on the JV team.<br /><br />But Palin compensated for what she lacked in talent (and height) with a freakish intensity. When I asked Elwyn Fischer, another classmate, how Palin got the nickname "barracuda," he thought it had to do with "that little grin thing she does." "She sets her teeth, it looks like she's eating jerky," Fischer said. "Flashing some fang, you know." Teeguarden allowed that "as a young player--freshman, sophomore--she was a bit foul-prone. ... She wasn't about to back down. I'm guessing it was connected to those kinds of things."<br /><br />Palin is often described in profiles as an academic standout. But, as on the basketball court, she was good but not great. Like most high schools, Wasilla had several distinct subcultures--among them, a religious/jock clique, of which Palin was a part, and a group of more bookish kids that took AP classes and studied theater. "We were considered the geekier, nerdy kids. We were smarter," recalls Elle Ede, another classmate. And yet Palin didn't lack for academic ambition. Rodger Foreman, one of her English teachers, would allow students to appeal their exam grades if they felt they'd been scored harshly. Foreman recalls that Palin regularly availed herself of the appeals process. "She was kind of like that. She thought she was right."<br />&nbsp;<br />By 1996, a cultural shift in Alaska had emboldened Palin to take on Carney and Stein and enforce her own sense of right. Since it came online in the 1970s, Alaska's oil pipeline had attracted legions of Sunbelters--oil men from Oklahoma, Texas, and Louisiana. They were largely right-wing evangelicals who preferred Wasilla--where land was cheap, zoning was minimal, and taxes were low--to the more uppity environs of Anchorage. Their presence led to a proliferation of conservative churches and anti-government attitudes. By 1994, the same Republican tide that swept the Democrats from Congress had reached the Mat-Su Valley as the conservative hordes came of age.<br /><br />In 1996, Palin was also asserting herself more and more. For example, she'd demand to know why Stein, the mayor, had "raised the budget." Stein and Carney tried to explain that he'd done nothing of the kind--that, when a city grows, businesses collect more in tax revenue, but that new residents also increase demand for public services. Palin wasn't appeased. She'd say things like, "'Oh, okay. Well, that's the way you think about it,'" Stein recalls. "I was thinking--these are things she should know better. Why is she asking me these stupid questions?"<br /><br />Carney saw ulterior motives. During a break one evening, he stopped Palin as she was heading to the restroom. "Sarah, it sounds like you're running for mayor," he said, half-joking. Palin turned red and became visibly upset. "What makes you say that? I never said I was running for mayor." "You never denied it, " Carney responded. Palin just repeated herself and stomped off.<br /><br />Within a few months, Palin was officially challenging Stein and exploiting the cultural shift masterfully. She welcomed a national anti-abortion group in to carpet bomb Wasilla with pink postcards affirming her pro-life bona fides. She orchestrated an NRA endorsement and a mailing from the group falsely proclaiming Stein, a lifelong hunter, "anti-gun." (Stein complained to the local newspaper that Palin was telling voters he wanted to "melt down" all the firearms in the state.) And, in a move practically out of Karl Rove's playbook, she dwelled on how Stein's wife used her maiden name, going so far as to demand a marriage certificate as proof of their nuptials. Palin's campaign literature proclaimed her "deeply devoted to conservative family values"--all in the context of an ostensibly nonpartisan election. (Stein himself was a moderate Republican.)<br /><br />Upon winning, Palin moved quickly to punish her snooty tormentors. Days after she was elected, the city council became deadlocked over how to fill two seats--Palin's and another that had opened up when its occupant won higher office. Palin insisted on making her own appointments, a move of dubious legality sure to irritate Carney. When he objected, she simply cut off discussion. She later accused him of sabotaging her proposed candidates. As she explained to the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman, the local paper: "'It was brilliant maneuvering I had to do to deal with the impasse.'" "And," the same article continued, "the look on Carney's face when she appointed Steve Stoll and Dianne Keller told her the strategy worked, she said."<br /><br />Within a year, Palin had blown through her personal enemies list. She had demanded the resignation of Emmons, the librarian opposed to censorship (who successfully fought for her job), and Irl Stambaugh, the city's police chief. Among Stambaugh's crimes? Insufficient enthusiasm when Palin asked him to file a weekly report listing "at least two positive examples of work that was started, how we helped the public, how we saved the City money, how we helped the state, how we helped Uncle Sam," according to The Seattle Times.</p>
<p>Palin also persuaded allies on the city council to can Dick Deuser, the city attorney. "She wanted yes-or-no answers ... and he would give her more sophisticated answers," recalls Anne Kilkenny, the local gadfly and author of an anti-Palin e-mail that became nearly ubiquitous after Palin joined the GOP ticket. "She hated it. ... She'd get very irritated, really irritated."<br /><br />And Palin took every opportunity to humiliate her former mentor. "She had people coming in, castigating me," Carney recalls. "Anything I proposed, even innocuous resolutions, went down to defeat." At city council meetings, Palin would sit and chitchat with allies at great length while Carney held his hand waiting to speak. Finally, toward the end of the meeting, Palin would turn and ask, "Oh, Nick, did you have something to say? Well, keep it brief." <br /><br />To this day, Palin's most impressive achievement--the one that vaulted her to the governorship and made her a candidate for vice president--was partly an outgrowth of these same resentments. In 2003, thenGovernor Frank Murkowski appointed Palin to be the "public member" on the three-person Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC). She resigned from the position eleven months later and, not long after, helped bring to light the ethical problems of a fellow commissioner named Randy Ruedrich.<br /><br />Ruedrich shared some of Nick Carney's qualities. He was well-educated (he'd come to the commission with a Ph.D. in engineering) and impatient with his intellectual inferiors. (As Palin crammed to get up to speed on energy issues, consuming several books recommended by her staff, Ruedrich seemed to scoff at her credentials.) But, unlike Carney, Ruedrich also violated ethics rules. After several months, it became obvious that Ruedrich was interacting privately with companies the aogcc regulated. Some of them, such as BP, owed him deferred compensation from earlier employment.<br /><br />Ruedrich's hauteur created tension with Palin from the get-go. "I got the impression he was surprised he wasn't made chairman instead of her," says Linda Berg, then an AOGCC administrative staffer. (A Ruedrich spokesman denies this.) "He was just arrogant. That's the biggest thing I remember." This appears to have exacerbated some of Palin's own insecurities. "She would say she wasn't qualified for the job," her fellow commissioner, Dan Seamount, told me. "I differed with her. She brought a lot."<br /><br />In addition to serving on the commission, Ruedrich headed the state Republican Party, and he would spend hours each day fielding calls on his cell phone. He also had a habit of bypassing Palin and speaking directly with contacts in Murkowski's orbit. Before long, Palin told Seamount that Ruedrich's private meetings really bothered her and reported them to her supervisors. Though Ruedrich eventually resigned, Palin worried about a possible cover-up. She quit the commission after urging the administration to come clean.<br /><br />It was a classic even-paranoids-have-enemies case. "[Ruedrich] didn't think she was much of a threat, nothing to be dealt with," says Seamount. Had Palin been a more mellow and forgiving soul, Ruedrich might have been right. But he badly miscalculated.<br />&nbsp;<br />Although Palin did Alaskans a service by blowing the whistle on Ruedrich, it's not exactly reassuring that a potential vice president is prone to vendettas that will on occasion be justified. One evening, I paid a visit to Anne Kilkenny, who had by this point ascended to local icon status. Kilkenny is a stout woman with a pretty face and a flair for the dramatic. Midway through our conversation, she turned to me and lowered her voice: "What happens to me if Sarah Palin wins?" Kilkenny believes she's on Palin's enemies list, though she concedes she doesn't know for sure what Palin thinks of her.<br /><br />It's easy to see Kilkenny as Palin's culture-war antithesis. She grew up in San Francisco and holds a degree from Berkeley. She proudly calls herself a social liberal. But Kilkenny isn't so easy to stereotype. Her husband, Pat Johnson, hails from a conservative Wasilla family that's been close to Palin's for decades. Pat's mom Eileen once belonged to a Christian women's group that included Palin's mother--"I used to walk with a limp, but my leg grew two inches after the ladies laid their hands on me," Eileen told me.<br /><br />Kilkenny initially supported Palin. But, once the mayor bludgeoned the town librarian about book-banning, Kilkenny and a group of concerned residents held a meeting to mull a possible recall. After much debate, they decided to help Palin become a better mayor instead.<br /><br />The group's efforts reflected a kind of establishment delusion--the hope that if you just surround the rough-hewn outsider with the right advisers and submerge her in the proper environment, she'll eventually assimilate. It's a delusion that's playing out all over again on the McCain campaign, amid all the briefings with the likes of Henry Kissinger and Joe Lieberman. Give Palin a few months in the Old Executive Office Building, the thinking goes, and she'll become Adlai Stevenson. But it never quite works out that way. As Nixon demonstrated, the forces of class resentment can be allconsuming and elemental.<br /><br />"I remember after the recall meeting how I was going to help her," Kilkenny told me. Palin had a habit of smacking gum during city council meetings. Kilkenny thought more people would take her seriously if she knocked it off. "So at the next council meeting, I sat next to her mom. I said, 'Tell Sarah to ditch the gum.'" And the response? "She didn't take it too well."<br /><br />Could Sarah Palin despise Anne Kilkenny because Kilkenny once suggested she refrain from chewing gum? I'd like to believe it's not true. But I'm honestly not so sure.<br /><br />&nbsp;<br /><br /><em>Noam Scheiber is a senior editor of The New Republic.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The link for the article from <a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=8c130fe3-adab-4cb3-8443-c363f085cf13&amp;p=3">The New Repulic</a> has been placed word for word here.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>This is an in Depth analysis on the Woman who is going to be one faint heartbeat away from the presidency.&nbsp; And for those of you who read this, I hope you relize just how dangerous such an ignorant person can be.&nbsp; For those of you who haven't read it, but feel the need to comment on its length, make random off the wall comments on anything no relating to this actually blog... then good for you.</strong></p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/991688/</link>
			<media:title type="html">Barracuda- The Political History of Sarah Palin</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/991688/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;As a warning, this is incredibly long.&amp;nbsp; We all know that Sarah Palin was the governor and then VP pick for her home state of Alaska, but how did she get there?&amp;nbsp; Here is an unbiased view at Sarah Palin, the self Proclaimed Hockey Mom, supporter of Joe Six-pack, and VP pick for McCain the Maverick.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's unlikely the name Sarah Palin would mean much to anyone if not for a man named Nick Carney. Long before she stood up to Republican cronies and &quot;the good old boys&quot; of Alaska, Palin stood up to Carney, a colleague on Wasilla's city council. As Kaylene Johnson explains in her sympathetic biography, Sarah, Carney had the gall to propose an ordinance giving his own company the city contract for garbage removal. In Johnson's telling, it was the first time Palin bravely spoke truth to power: &quot;'I said no and I voted no,' Sarah said. 'People should have the choice about whether or not to haul their garbage to the dump.'&quot; Johnson writes that Palin's vote made Carney into a &quot;political enemy&quot;--the first of many, it turns out.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The episode might serve as a compelling, if small-bore, example of Palin's reformer instincts. Except that, according to those who were present, Carney wasn't quite the crooked trash magnate Palin makes him out to be. For one thing, Carney couldn't have proposed the ordinance because he'd recused himself from the matter. The council, in fact, had asked him to appear as a kind of expert witness on the relevant rules and regulations. &quot;I looked at it as we actually had an expert on the council sharing the information,&quot; recalls Laura Chase, a fellow councilwoman. &quot;Not ... conspiring over a contract. There was no way that was happening.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So if it wasn't a sinister garbage conspiracy that put Carney in Palin's crosshairs, what was it? At first glance, the two would have appeared to be allies--both had spent most of their lives in Wasilla and had attended the same high school. But, beyond that, they were sociological opposites in almost every respect. Whereas Palin had bounced around several no-name colleges before graduating from the University of Idaho, Carney held a degree from Dartmouth. Palin seemed preoccupied with her family and church when she entered politics. Carney was preoccupied with histories of the Civil War and World War II (he later contributed a self-published book to the genre) and savored the New York Times crossword puzzle. By the time he joined the city council, Carney had traveled to Asia, Australia, and Central America. He'd run the Anchorage office of Alaska's economic development agency and had served as the state's agriculture director. &quot;I'd dealt with larger budgets by far than the city of Wasilla,&quot; he recently told me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Carney had a wry sense of humor. He was fond of joking that he'd graduated from Wasilla High School in the &quot;top 20 percent&quot;--by which he meant he was valedictorian of his five-person class. Sometimes Palin was the only colleague who didn't get his jokes. &quot;I don't think he had too much patience for her lack of understanding,&quot; says John Stein, then the town's mayor. In internal discussions, Carney would be relentlessly logical while Palin was vague and intuitive. &quot;Nick had a way of being direct and to the point, something that Sarah was uncomfortable with,&quot; recalls Chase. Which is to say, when it came to garbage removal, what Palin seemed to have chafed against was less the substance of Carney's position than what she felt was his elitist, Ivy League bearing. And, over the next few years, she found ways to get him back.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These days, Palin is engaged in this same fight against elites, though on a considerably larger stage. &quot;I'm not one of those who maybe came from a background of, you know, kids who perhaps graduate college and their parents give them a passport and give them a backpack and say go off and travel the world,&quot; she recently told Katie Couric. &quot;No, I've worked all my life.&quot; That hardly makes her the first politician to run on class resentments--nearly every conservative from George W. Bush to Mitt Romney has sought a bond with voters by attacking the over-educated and entitled. But more often than not these conservatives are elites themselves; hence the spectacle of Yale legacies and Harvard millionaires (and most of the Fox News executive suite) railing against wine-swilling sophisticates.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Palin, by contrast, may be the first conservative politician since Nixon to experience resentment so authentically. For her, it's not so much a political tool as a motivating principle. A trip through Palin's past reveals that almost every step of her career can be understood as a reaction to elitist condescension--much of it in her own mind.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Before he became her enemy, Nick Carney was actually Palin's mentor--though, like John McCain, his reasons for championing her had much to do with his own political agenda. In the early '90s, Carney and a group of local business leaders decided the city needed a sales tax to fund public services--such as a police force--it could no longer live without. To advance this position in an area not exactly teeming with Great Society liberals, they'd formed a group called &quot;Watch on Wasilla&quot; and persuaded John Stein, then the mayor, to embrace their cause. Carney won his seat on the city council in 1992 on the back of these efforts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Heading into that election, Carney and Stein realized their program would go nowhere if they couldn't connect with what you might call Wal-Mart moms--that great mass of voters too busy earning a living and raising their families to follow local politics. &quot;We were lacking lines of communication between the council as it existed and the younger bloc of voters in town,&quot; recalls Carney. &quot;We didn't have anyone on there who worked [as a laborer] for a living or who was a housewife.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Carney's daughter had gone to high school with Palin; Stein and his wife knew her from an aerobics class they attended. She seemed bright and energetic and had a winning way about her--the same qualities McCain would notice 15 years later. They invited her to attend a &quot;Watch on Wasilla&quot; meeting and, after a brief interview, asked her to run on their moderate plank. Carney introduced her to local business leaders and campaigned alongside her. &quot;I took her around . .. and said, 'This is a person who supports our points of view. She'll do what she can to make the police force run.' And she did it.&quot; It was a bit like Palin's convention rollout in miniature, and the initial effect was similar. Palin breezed into office with Carney that October.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Palin's first year or two on the council went smoothly by all accounts. &quot;I was relatively pleased at the fact that she did communicate back and forth to that group,&quot; Carney says. &quot;She would make good decisions.&quot; But, in retrospect, there were signs of tension. Though council members routinely bickered with one another, Palin became defensive when she was on the receiving end. &quot;Sarah is intimidated, in my personal opinion, by people who are intelligent,&quot; Laura Chase says.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The city had traditionally put up part of the purse for the Iron Dog competition--the grueling, 2,000-mile snow machine race that usually starts in Wasilla--and one year the council considered upping its ante. (First prize could be tens of thousands of dollars.) When a colleague pointed out that Palin should recuse herself because her husband was a perennial Iron Dog contender, she protested, &quot;I don't think I have a conflict of interest here because Todd won it last year. There's no guarantee that he's going to win it this year.&quot; As others chimed in to explain the problem, Palin dug in her heels. &quot;Well, it could be perceived that way, but it isn't,&quot; she harrumphed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As a rule, the city's department heads attended every city council meeting. One evening, as the session wound down, Palin mentioned to Mary Ellen Emmons, the library director, that something had been bothering her--a book she thought was overly indulgent of homosexuality. &quot;She said there was no room in our library for that kind of stuff,&quot; recalls Chase. Emmons curtly disagreed, but Palin was adamant. She suggested the librarian could at least keep such books in the reference section, where visitors would have to request them. &quot;We don't believe in censoring books,&quot; Emmons finally told her, at which point Palin trailed off muttering.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Palin also butted heads at times with Dick Deuser, the city attorney. Deuser was not your average small-town lawyer. He'd attended law school at the University of Minnesota and had worked for a prominent Anchorage firm. At one point, the council asked him about the legality of banning group homes--such as shelters for runaways--a position Palin championed. Deuser had an academic manner and was fond of citing Supreme Court precedent. When he explained that a ban would be unconstitutional, Palin appeared impatient with such legal niceties. &quot;I would describe it this way: Sarah was not an in-depth person. Never has, never will be,&quot; Deuser says. &quot;Her instincts are political as opposed to evaluative.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;That Palin would feel threatened by the more urbane members of the community is no surprise given her upbringing. Late one September morning in Wasilla, I met a high school classmate of Palin's named Perry Cowles, a warm, scruffy- looking man with a soul patch and hipster glasses. Cowles overhauls hot rods for a living, and his shop sits at the front of a three-acre lot. A few hundred yards back is his residence, which he described to me as &quot;a typical Alaska house: seven hundred feet of living space; five thousand feet of garage space.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For lunch, Cowles took me to a restaurant near the top of Hatcher Pass, a fearsome peak from which, on a clear day, you can see the Knik River off in the distance. He flipped through his high school yearbook while we ate. Almost every page reminded him of another classmate who'd passed away--one who died when his prop-jet crashed, another who drowned in a lake. I got the sense life in small-town Alaska was somehow more precarious than in the lower 48.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Or, for that matter, in Anchorage. Though it's only 45 miles away, Anchorage can feel like an alternate universe--a far more affluent and cosmopolitan one at that. In Wasilla, the resentment has sometimes been intense. Cowles had been a hockey player in high school. In those days, the town had a single outdoor rink, which he and his teammates would mop after games and practices. He jokingly recalled how the Anchorage teams would show up in their parents' new cars wearing $200 skates &quot;while we had tennis shoes with butter knives.&quot; &quot;I'll never forget--we had a game with a team we were outmatched against,&quot; Cowles told me. &quot;Our coach said, 'We can't win. But you go out there and I want blood. I want you to teach these rich kids a lesson.' And we did.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Palin nursed a milder form of this grievance as a high school basketball player. When Palin's coach, Don Teeguarden, arrived at the school in 1976, there were only 300 students and the team was abysmal. To improve, Teeguarden scheduled the powerful Anchorage teams, which, he told me, &quot;was a pretty easy sell&quot; for a no-name like Wasilla. By the time Palin was playing for him a few years later, the Wasilla girls had improved significantly--becoming a state power in their own right--but they still sometimes struggled to be taken seriously. &quot;It was easy to put that small school chip on our shoulder,&quot; says Teeguarden. &quot;If an Anchorage school came to Wasilla and we won, it was like it didn't count because they had to travel forty miles. To really get much respect from the Anchorage press, we had to go into town and win.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Palin's church, the Wasilla Assembly of God, also marked her as an outsider. The modern Pentecostal tradition traces its roots to a grassroots religious fervor at the start of the twentieth century. In the ensuing decades, followers tended to be less educated and affluent than their Protestant brethren. The tradition is also more democratic, in that it emphasizes a direct connection with Christ through the Holy Spirit. Hence the Pentecostal practice of speaking in tongues (in which congregants are moved by the Holy Spirit to speak in unfamiliar languages) and the laying on of hands (in which congregants invoke the Holy Spirit and heal one another with their touch).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Paul Riley, the church's founding pastor, personally epitomized the overlay of religion and class in Wasilla. Since Riley's work as a minister wasn't lucrative enough to support his family, he spent years moonlighting as a school bus driver while his wife worked in the post office. He sometimes endured the sneering of local elites. In 1980, he decided to construct a building large enough to house a 1,000-member church--a far bigger flock than he had at the time. It was a massive undertaking that took four years to complete and required $1 million in capital, even with the help of dozens of volunteers from around the country. &quot;I had one banker that was concerned about me,&quot; Riley told me. &quot;He said, 'What'll happen if you can't pay back the loan?' I said, 'We'll be here when you're gone.' The honest truth: He was gone before the church was finished. The bank went belly-up. ... I just felt in my own heart that God was giving us direction.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Against this backdrop, Palin suffered her own petty slights and indignities. Growing up, she'd been pushed to great lengths by her hard-charging father, Chuck Heath. Heath had competed in the Boston Marathon and would lead his brood on grueling runs through the Mat-Su Valley. He had exacting standards for his children, sometimes higher than his daughter could deliver on. Palin was, according to classmates, an above-average basketball player, but hardly a star. Even as a junior, she found herself languishing on the JV team.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But Palin compensated for what she lacked in talent (and height) with a freakish intensity. When I asked Elwyn Fischer, another classmate, how Palin got the nickname &quot;barracuda,&quot; he thought it had to do with &quot;that little grin thing she does.&quot; &quot;She sets her teeth, it looks like she's eating jerky,&quot; Fischer said. &quot;Flashing some fang, you know.&quot; Teeguarden allowed that &quot;as a young player--freshman, sophomore--she was a bit foul-prone. ... She wasn't about to back down. I'm guessing it was connected to those kinds of things.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Palin is often described in profiles as an academic standout. But, as on the basketball court, she was good but not great. Like most high schools, Wasilla had several distinct subcultures--among them, a religious/jock clique, of which Palin was a part, and a group of more bookish kids that took AP classes and studied theater. &quot;We were considered the geekier, nerdy kids. We were smarter,&quot; recalls Elle Ede, another classmate. And yet Palin didn't lack for academic ambition. Rodger Foreman, one of her English teachers, would allow students to appeal their exam grades if they felt they'd been scored harshly. Foreman recalls that Palin regularly availed herself of the appeals process. &quot;She was kind of like that. She thought she was right.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;By 1996, a cultural shift in Alaska had emboldened Palin to take on Carney and Stein and enforce her own sense of right. Since it came online in the 1970s, Alaska's oil pipeline had attracted legions of Sunbelters--oil men from Oklahoma, Texas, and Louisiana. They were largely right-wing evangelicals who preferred Wasilla--where land was cheap, zoning was minimal, and taxes were low--to the more uppity environs of Anchorage. Their presence led to a proliferation of conservative churches and anti-government attitudes. By 1994, the same Republican tide that swept the Democrats from Congress had reached the Mat-Su Valley as the conservative hordes came of age.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In 1996, Palin was also asserting herself more and more. For example, she'd demand to know why Stein, the mayor, had &quot;raised the budget.&quot; Stein and Carney tried to explain that he'd done nothing of the kind--that, when a city grows, businesses collect more in tax revenue, but that new residents also increase demand for public services. Palin wasn't appeased. She'd say things like, &quot;'Oh, okay. Well, that's the way you think about it,'&quot; Stein recalls. &quot;I was thinking--these are things she should know better. Why is she asking me these stupid questions?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Carney saw ulterior motives. During a break one evening, he stopped Palin as she was heading to the restroom. &quot;Sarah, it sounds like you're running for mayor,&quot; he said, half-joking. Palin turned red and became visibly upset. &quot;What makes you say that? I never said I was running for mayor.&quot; &quot;You never denied it, &quot; Carney responded. Palin just repeated herself and stomped off.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Within a few months, Palin was officially challenging Stein and exploiting the cultural shift masterfully. She welcomed a national anti-abortion group in to carpet bomb Wasilla with pink postcards affirming her pro-life bona fides. She orchestrated an NRA endorsement and a mailing from the group falsely proclaiming Stein, a lifelong hunter, &quot;anti-gun.&quot; (Stein complained to the local newspaper that Palin was telling voters he wanted to &quot;melt down&quot; all the firearms in the state.) And, in a move practically out of Karl Rove's playbook, she dwelled on how Stein's wife used her maiden name, going so far as to demand a marriage certificate as proof of their nuptials. Palin's campaign literature proclaimed her &quot;deeply devoted to conservative family values&quot;--all in the context of an ostensibly nonpartisan election. (Stein himself was a moderate Republican.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Upon winning, Palin moved quickly to punish her snooty tormentors. Days after she was elected, the city council became deadlocked over how to fill two seats--Palin's and another that had opened up when its occupant won higher office. Palin insisted on making her own appointments, a move of dubious legality sure to irritate Carney. When he objected, she simply cut off discussion. She later accused him of sabotaging her proposed candidates. As she explained to the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman, the local paper: &quot;'It was brilliant maneuvering I had to do to deal with the impasse.'&quot; &quot;And,&quot; the same article continued, &quot;the look on Carney's face when she appointed Steve Stoll and Dianne Keller told her the strategy worked, she said.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Within a year, Palin had blown through her personal enemies list. She had demanded the resignation of Emmons, the librarian opposed to censorship (who successfully fought for her job), and Irl Stambaugh, the city's police chief. Among Stambaugh's crimes? Insufficient enthusiasm when Palin asked him to file a weekly report listing &quot;at least two positive examples of work that was started, how we helped the public, how we saved the City money, how we helped the state, how we helped Uncle Sam,&quot; according to The Seattle Times.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Palin also persuaded allies on the city council to can Dick Deuser, the city attorney. &quot;She wanted yes-or-no answers ... and he would give her more sophisticated answers,&quot; recalls Anne Kilkenny, the local gadfly and author of an anti-Palin e-mail that became nearly ubiquitous after Palin joined the GOP ticket. &quot;She hated it. ... She'd get very irritated, really irritated.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And Palin took every opportunity to humiliate her former mentor. &quot;She had people coming in, castigating me,&quot; Carney recalls. &quot;Anything I proposed, even innocuous resolutions, went down to defeat.&quot; At city council meetings, Palin would sit and chitchat with allies at great length while Carney held his hand waiting to speak. Finally, toward the end of the meeting, Palin would turn and ask, &quot;Oh, Nick, did you have something to say? Well, keep it brief.&quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To this day, Palin's most impressive achievement--the one that vaulted her to the governorship and made her a candidate for vice president--was partly an outgrowth of these same resentments. In 2003, thenGovernor Frank Murkowski appointed Palin to be the &quot;public member&quot; on the three-person Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC). She resigned from the position eleven months later and, not long after, helped bring to light the ethical problems of a fellow commissioner named Randy Ruedrich.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ruedrich shared some of Nick Carney's qualities. He was well-educated (he'd come to the commission with a Ph.D. in engineering) and impatient with his intellectual inferiors. (As Palin crammed to get up to speed on energy issues, consuming several books recommended by her staff, Ruedrich seemed to scoff at her credentials.) But, unlike Carney, Ruedrich also violated ethics rules. After several months, it became obvious that Ruedrich was interacting privately with companies the aogcc regulated. Some of them, such as BP, owed him deferred compensation from earlier employment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ruedrich's hauteur created tension with Palin from the get-go. &quot;I got the impression he was surprised he wasn't made chairman instead of her,&quot; says Linda Berg, then an AOGCC administrative staffer. (A Ruedrich spokesman denies this.) &quot;He was just arrogant. That's the biggest thing I remember.&quot; This appears to have exacerbated some of Palin's own insecurities. &quot;She would say she wasn't qualified for the job,&quot; her fellow commissioner, Dan Seamount, told me. &quot;I differed with her. She brought a lot.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In addition to serving on the commission, Ruedrich headed the state Republican Party, and he would spend hours each day fielding calls on his cell phone. He also had a habit of bypassing Palin and speaking directly with contacts in Murkowski's orbit. Before long, Palin told Seamount that Ruedrich's private meetings really bothered her and reported them to her supervisors. Though Ruedrich eventually resigned, Palin worried about a possible cover-up. She quit the commission after urging the administration to come clean.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was a classic even-paranoids-have-enemies case. &quot;[Ruedrich] didn't think she was much of a threat, nothing to be dealt with,&quot; says Seamount. Had Palin been a more mellow and forgiving soul, Ruedrich might have been right. But he badly miscalculated.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Although Palin did Alaskans a service by blowing the whistle on Ruedrich, it's not exactly reassuring that a potential vice president is prone to vendettas that will on occasion be justified. One evening, I paid a visit to Anne Kilkenny, who had by this point ascended to local icon status. Kilkenny is a stout woman with a pretty face and a flair for the dramatic. Midway through our conversation, she turned to me and lowered her voice: &quot;What happens to me if Sarah Palin wins?&quot; Kilkenny believes she's on Palin's enemies list, though she concedes she doesn't know for sure what Palin thinks of her.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's easy to see Kilkenny as Palin's culture-war antithesis. She grew up in San Francisco and holds a degree from Berkeley. She proudly calls herself a social liberal. But Kilkenny isn't so easy to stereotype. Her husband, Pat Johnson, hails from a conservative Wasilla family that's been close to Palin's for decades. Pat's mom Eileen once belonged to a Christian women's group that included Palin's mother--&quot;I used to walk with a limp, but my leg grew two inches after the ladies laid their hands on me,&quot; Eileen told me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kilkenny initially supported Palin. But, once the mayor bludgeoned the town librarian about book-banning, Kilkenny and a group of concerned residents held a meeting to mull a possible recall. After much debate, they decided to help Palin become a better mayor instead.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The group's efforts reflected a kind of establishment delusion--the hope that if you just surround the rough-hewn outsider with the right advisers and submerge her in the proper environment, she'll eventually assimilate. It's a delusion that's playing out all over again on the McCain campaign, amid all the briefings with the likes of Henry Kissinger and Joe Lieberman. Give Palin a few months in the Old Executive Office Building, the thinking goes, and she'll become Adlai Stevenson. But it never quite works out that way. As Nixon demonstrated, the forces of class resentment can be allconsuming and elemental.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;I remember after the recall meeting how I was going to help her,&quot; Kilkenny told me. Palin had a habit of smacking gum during city council meetings. Kilkenny thought more people would take her seriously if she knocked it off. &quot;So at the next council meeting, I sat next to her mom. I said, 'Tell Sarah to ditch the gum.'&quot; And the response? &quot;She didn't take it too well.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Could Sarah Palin despise Anne Kilkenny because Kilkenny once suggested she refrain from chewing gum? I'd like to believe it's not true. But I'm honestly not so sure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Noam Scheiber is a senior editor of The New Republic.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The link for the article from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=8c130fe3-adab-4cb3-8443-c363f085cf13&amp;amp;p=3&quot;&gt;The New Repulic&lt;/a&gt; has been placed word for word here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;This is an in Depth analysis on the Woman who is going to be one faint heartbeat away from the presidency.&amp;nbsp; And for those of you who read this, I hope you relize just how dangerous such an ignorant person can be.&amp;nbsp; For those of you who haven't read it, but feel the need to comment on its length, make random off the wall comments on anything no relating to this actually blog... then good for you.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>983597</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:02:42 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				-The Real McCain-			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/983597/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-10-07 01:02:42<br />
							<p>I found out it's much easier to allow McCain to show his own Hypocrisy, then it is to try and explain it myself.&nbsp; So, lets go to the source!&nbsp; John McCain, speaking about his stances on issues, and then quickly changing them when it becomes Advantageous. His, "Straight Talk Express", obviously goes both ways, which of course McCain is both for and against.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>On- The Iraq War, the Confederate Flag, The Religious Right, Gay Marriage</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p></a>

<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ioy90nF2anI&amp;border=0&amp;rel=0" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ioy90nF2anI&amp;border=0&amp;rel=0" wmode="transparent"></embed>

</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>On- The threat level on ground forces in Iraq, Katrina, Experience on Economics, the current American Economy, his stance on Tax-Cuts</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p></a>

<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GEtZlR3zp4c&amp;border=0&amp;rel=0" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GEtZlR3zp4c&amp;border=0&amp;rel=0" wmode="transparent"></embed>

</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Now, you have all heard about Obama's reverend, and of course now Palin is trying to Tie Obama even closer to Dr. Reverend Jeremiah Wright.&nbsp; Well take a Look at McCains pastor!&nbsp; (Normally I say this is off limits, but since the McCain Campaign has opened the door, fight fire with fire!)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Ladies and Gentlemen, here is Reverend John Hagee</strong></span></p>
<p></a>

<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WXZbIGJrDkg&amp;border=0&amp;rel=0" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WXZbIGJrDkg&amp;border=0&amp;rel=0" wmode="transparent"></embed>

</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>And finally, I wanna end this with a discussion featuring Olbarmman, followed by a Message from other Veterans then Just myself on how the New GI bill was crushed because of Opposition to it by McCain and others... If he supports the troops so much, then why the fuck won't he help them pay for their books?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Discussion<br /></strong></span></p>
<p></a>

<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-z0gItNlfMM&amp;border=0&amp;rel=0" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-z0gItNlfMM&amp;border=0&amp;rel=0" wmode="transparent"></embed>

</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Veterans Talk</strong></span></p>
<p></a>

<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pK_9sI7hzAc&amp;border=0&amp;rel=0" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pK_9sI7hzAc&amp;border=0&amp;rel=0" wmode="transparent"></embed>

</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>And for those of you wondering if he did support the bill in the end?&nbsp; The answer is No, he didn't even show up to say Yea or Nay, which is the least he could have fucking done as his duty as a Senator.&nbsp; Don't believe me, there here you go.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/05/23/mccain_misses_vote_on_a_new_gi_bill_scorns_criticism_from_obama/">Where was McCain?</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>There you go people, this is the Canidate for the Republican nomination, most of it done in his very own words.&nbsp; I invite you to try and disprove any of this.&nbsp; You are not an idiot for Supporting McCain or being a Republican, but you need to know the canidate you are voting for.</p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/983597/</link>
			<media:title type="html">-The Real McCain-</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/983597/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;I found out it's much easier to allow McCain to show his own Hypocrisy, then it is to try and explain it myself.&amp;nbsp; So, lets go to the source!&amp;nbsp; John McCain, speaking about his stances on issues, and then quickly changing them when it becomes Advantageous. His, &quot;Straight Talk Express&quot;, obviously goes both ways, which of course McCain is both for and against.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On- The Iraq War, the Confederate Flag, The Religious Right, Gay Marriage&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/ioy90nF2anI&amp;amp;border=0&amp;amp;rel=0&quot; /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot; /&gt;&lt;embed type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/ioy90nF2anI&amp;amp;border=0&amp;amp;rel=0&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On- The threat level on ground forces in Iraq, Katrina, Experience on Economics, the current American Economy, his stance on Tax-Cuts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/GEtZlR3zp4c&amp;amp;border=0&amp;amp;rel=0&quot; /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot; /&gt;&lt;embed type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/GEtZlR3zp4c&amp;amp;border=0&amp;amp;rel=0&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, you have all heard about Obama's reverend, and of course now Palin is trying to Tie Obama even closer to Dr. Reverend Jeremiah Wright.&amp;nbsp; Well take a Look at McCains pastor!&amp;nbsp; (Normally I say this is off limits, but since the McCain Campaign has opened the door, fight fire with fire!)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ladies and Gentlemen, here is Reverend John Hagee&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/WXZbIGJrDkg&amp;amp;border=0&amp;amp;rel=0&quot; /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot; /&gt;&lt;embed type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/WXZbIGJrDkg&amp;amp;border=0&amp;amp;rel=0&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And finally, I wanna end this with a discussion featuring Olbarmman, followed by a Message from other Veterans then Just myself on how the New GI bill was crushed because of Opposition to it by McCain and others... If he supports the troops so much, then why the fuck won't he help them pay for their books?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Discussion&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/-z0gItNlfMM&amp;amp;border=0&amp;amp;rel=0&quot; /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot; /&gt;&lt;embed type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/-z0gItNlfMM&amp;amp;border=0&amp;amp;rel=0&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Veterans Talk&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/pK_9sI7hzAc&amp;amp;border=0&amp;amp;rel=0&quot; /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot; /&gt;&lt;embed type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/pK_9sI7hzAc&amp;amp;border=0&amp;amp;rel=0&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And for those of you wondering if he did support the bill in the end?&amp;nbsp; The answer is No, he didn't even show up to say Yea or Nay, which is the least he could have fucking done as his duty as a Senator.&amp;nbsp; Don't believe me, there here you go.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/05/23/mccain_misses_vote_on_a_new_gi_bill_scorns_criticism_from_obama/&quot;&gt;Where was McCain?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There you go people, this is the Canidate for the Republican nomination, most of it done in his very own words.&amp;nbsp; I invite you to try and disprove any of this.&amp;nbsp; You are not an idiot for Supporting McCain or being a Republican, but you need to know the canidate you are voting for.&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>981974</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 01:45:54 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				-Why Americans shouldn't vote for John McCain-			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/981974/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-10-06 01:45:54<br />
							<p>Wow, it's nice the we as Democrats finally have a candidate who is willing to fight back.&nbsp; I'm sure most of us have seen the blog written about Barracks ties to a Once Radical Ayers.&nbsp; Well, in response to past associations, Obama has decided to open guns on McCains past relationships with the "Keatin Five" Savings and loans scandal.&nbsp; Guilt by association goes both ways for all of you die-hard fans of McCain.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>How could you possibly support a Candidate who helped start the current Mortgage crises we are in now!?&nbsp; God, everyone who votes for McCain must all be idiots.&nbsp; (See how that looks FuckTedKennedy?)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Have fun with this-</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://keatingeconomics.com/">http://keatingeconomics.com/</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/981974/</link>
			<media:title type="html">-Why Americans shouldn't vote for John McCain-</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/981974/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wow, it's nice the we as Democrats finally have a candidate who is willing to fight back.&amp;nbsp; I'm sure most of us have seen the blog written about Barracks ties to a Once Radical Ayers.&amp;nbsp; Well, in response to past associations, Obama has decided to open guns on McCains past relationships with the &quot;Keatin Five&quot; Savings and loans scandal.&amp;nbsp; Guilt by association goes both ways for all of you die-hard fans of McCain.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How could you possibly support a Candidate who helped start the current Mortgage crises we are in now!?&amp;nbsp; God, everyone who votes for McCain must all be idiots.&amp;nbsp; (See how that looks FuckTedKennedy?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have fun with this-&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://keatingeconomics.com/&quot;&gt;http://keatingeconomics.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>981372</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:08:00 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				-If you don't Vote, then you are Worthless-			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/981372/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-10-05 20:08:00<br />
							<p>Whether you hate it or love it, these are the only times in your life where your voice, not matter how small, matters to those in government.&nbsp; Elections are crucial to our representative form of government.&nbsp; Go out and <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>VOTE!</strong></span>&nbsp; Otherwise you mean nothing whatsoever, as you will be worthless to the people who represent the state or nation that you live in.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For those of you who say, "Your vote doesn't matter", then why do the very Politicians you despise are willing to spend millions of dollars just to reach your ears?&nbsp; It's worth something to them, and it can be worth something to you.&nbsp; If you do not like the candidates, then you can vote for who ever the hell you want!&nbsp; Write fucking Mickey mouse or Darth Vader in the Ballot! You're lazy, that's all it means, and there are <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>NO</strong></span> excuses.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If you want more then your single voice, then go out and help campaign for the person you want into the Presidency, or the Congress, or the Mayors office.&nbsp; Easily you can turn one vote, into 20 votes by just helping to register people.&nbsp; You don't like how campaigns are run?&nbsp; Then Vote AGAINST THEM!&nbsp; Vote for fucking Ron Paul!&nbsp; Just VOTE! Otherwise, you're just allowing it to continue.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Pease, educate yourself in Elections!&nbsp; Hell, even just look at the current candidates websites!&nbsp; All it takes is 5 mins out of your life, and I guarantee it will be fore the Better; or else the very people you despise most might get into a office that has direct influence over you.&nbsp; Don't be part of the "Apathetic" problem.&nbsp; If you don't vote, then they will not listen to your complaints for suggestions.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This isn't a request that you vote for Barack Obama or John McCain, this is a request that you just take charge of your single ballot.&nbsp; Here is a quick satire, and if you do not like the way campaigns are done, then actually use your voice to call for a change, instead of complaining to those of us who do vote and take a part in the process.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/adc3MSS5Ydc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /></a><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/adc3MSS5Ydc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/981372/</link>
			<media:title type="html">-If you don't Vote, then you are Worthless-</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/981372/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;Whether you hate it or love it, these are the only times in your life where your voice, not matter how small, matters to those in government.&amp;nbsp; Elections are crucial to our representative form of government.&amp;nbsp; Go out and &lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;VOTE!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp; Otherwise you mean nothing whatsoever, as you will be worthless to the people who represent the state or nation that you live in.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For those of you who say, &quot;Your vote doesn't matter&quot;, then why do the very Politicians you despise are willing to spend millions of dollars just to reach your ears?&amp;nbsp; It's worth something to them, and it can be worth something to you.&amp;nbsp; If you do not like the candidates, then you can vote for who ever the hell you want!&amp;nbsp; Write fucking Mickey mouse or Darth Vader in the Ballot! You're lazy, that's all it means, and there are &lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NO&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; excuses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you want more then your single voice, then go out and help campaign for the person you want into the Presidency, or the Congress, or the Mayors office.&amp;nbsp; Easily you can turn one vote, into 20 votes by just helping to register people.&amp;nbsp; You don't like how campaigns are run?&amp;nbsp; Then Vote AGAINST THEM!&amp;nbsp; Vote for fucking Ron Paul!&amp;nbsp; Just VOTE! Otherwise, you're just allowing it to continue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pease, educate yourself in Elections!&amp;nbsp; Hell, even just look at the current candidates websites!&amp;nbsp; All it takes is 5 mins out of your life, and I guarantee it will be fore the Better; or else the very people you despise most might get into a office that has direct influence over you.&amp;nbsp; Don't be part of the &quot;Apathetic&quot; problem.&amp;nbsp; If you don't vote, then they will not listen to your complaints for suggestions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This isn't a request that you vote for Barack Obama or John McCain, this is a request that you just take charge of your single ballot.&amp;nbsp; Here is a quick satire, and if you do not like the way campaigns are done, then actually use your voice to call for a change, instead of complaining to those of us who do vote and take a part in the process.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/adc3MSS5Ydc&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&quot; /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;allowFullScreen&quot; value=&quot;true&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;embed type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;344&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/adc3MSS5Ydc&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>980898</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 13:57:56 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				-McCain Lies exposed-			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/980898/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-10-05 13:57:56<br />
							<div class="article_header">Once again, false attacks against parts of Obamas proposed Econimic Plan are done by both Palin and McCain in their respective debates and campaigns.&nbsp; It's almost becoming more predictable then Palins Barbie smile when talking about the War in Iraq.&nbsp; So, I found this article and posted it here.</div>
<div class="article_header"><br /></div>
<div class="article_header">The Following article is from <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/there_he_goes_again.html">Factcheck.org</a><br /></div>
<div class="article_header"><br /></div>
<div class="article_header"><br /></div>
<div class="article_header" style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span>There He Goes Again</span></strong></span></div>
<div class="article_date" style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span>September 18, 2008</span></strong></span></div>
<div class="article_subheader" style="text-align: center;"><br /></div>
<div class="article_subheader" style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span>McCain ad misrepresents Obama's tax plan. Again.</span></strong></span></div>
<div class="article_section_header"><br /></div>
<div class="article_section_header"><br /></div>
<div class="article_section_header"><br /></div>
<div class="article_section_header"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span>Summary</span></strong></span></div>
<div class="article_section_header"><br /></div>
<div class="article_section"><span style="font-size: small;">The McCain-Palin campaign has released a new ad that once again distorts Obama's tax plans.<br /> </span> 
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: small;">The ad claims Obama will raise taxes on electricity. He hasn't proposed any such tax. Obama does support a cap-and-trade policy that would raise the costs of electricity, but so does McCain.</span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: small;">It falsely claims he would tax home heating oil. Actually, Obama proposed a rebate of up to $1,000 per family to defray increased heating oil costs, funded by what he calls a windfall profits tax on oil companies.<br /> </span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: small;">The ad claims that Obama will tax "life savings." In fact, he would increase capital gains and dividends taxes only for couples earning more than $250,000 per year, or singles making $200,000. For the rest, taxes on investments would remain unchanged.<br /> </span></li>
</ul>
<span style="font-size: small;">The McCain campaign argues in its documentation for this ad that, whatever Obama says he would do, he will eventually be forced to break his promise and raise taxes more broadly to pay for his promised spending programs. That's an opinion they are certainly entitled to express, and to argue for. But their ad doesn't do that. Instead, it simply presents the McCain camp's opinion as a fact, and it fails to alert viewers that its claims are based on what the campaign thinks might happen in the future.<br /> </span></div>
<div class="article_section_header"><span>Analysis</span></div>
<div class="article_section"><span style="font-size: small;">In what has become an ongoing theme, the McCain-Palin campaign has released yet another ad that makes false claims about Barack Obama's tax plan. The ad, which was released on Sept. 18 and which the campaign says will air nationally, claims that Obama will raise income taxes and will tax "life savings, electricity and home heating oil." As we keep saying, Obama says he'll raise income taxes and capital gains taxes only for couples earning more than $250,000 per year or singles making over $200,000. He has proposed no plans to raise taxes on either home heating oil or electricity.<br /> <br /> </span>
<div><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Electric Charges</span></span></strong></span><br /></div>
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /> <span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><strong> </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size: small;">
<div class="FloatingBoxLeftLightGreen">
<div><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #800000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: medium;">McCain-Palin 2008 Ad:</span></span><span style="color: #800000;"><br /> </span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #800000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: medium;">"Dome"</span></span><br /> <br /> <img src="http://cdn.factcheck.org/imagefiles/2008_9_18_McCain_Dome/Dome04-tn.jpg" border="0" width="175" height="118" /><br /> <br /></div>
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><strong>Narrator:</strong> When our economy's in crisis, a big government casts a big shadow on us all.<br /> <br /> Obama and his liberal Congressional allies want a massive government, billions in spending increases, wasteful pork.<br /> <br /> And, we would pay -- painful income taxes, skyrocketing taxes on life savings, electricity and home heating oil.<br /> <br /> Can your family afford that?<br /> <br /> <strong>McCain: </strong>I'm John McCain and I approve this message.</span></div>
The ad opens with standard-issue Republican warnings of the economic dangers of big government before proclaiming that Obama and his liberal allies want to bring back "a massive government" complete with billions in spending increases and waste. We are then told that Obama would raise income taxes and would increase taxes on "life savings, electricity and home heating oil."<br /> <br /> This isn't the <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obamas_celebrity_cred.html">first time</a> the McCain-Palin campaign has claimed that Obama would raise taxes on electricity. The claim is just as false now as it was when it first came up. The campaign bases its charge on a single comment Obama made in an <a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/MYSA021908_ObamaQnA_e-n_c1d9803_html19832.html">interview</a> with a San Antonio columnist. </span><span style="font-size: small;">Obama did in fact say, "What we ought to tax is dirty energy, like coal and, to a lesser extent, natural gas." But, as we said then, the comment is grossly out of context. Obama's remark comes after he was asked whether we ought to tax renewable energy sources. This was not a general call for increasing taxes on coal or natural gas, and Obama certainly does not have any such proposal as part of his public platform.<br /> <br /> One could argue that Obama's proposed cap-and-trade program constitutes an indirect tax on electricity. But McCain <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com//Informing/Issues/17671aa4-2fe8-4008-859f-0ef1468e96f4.htm">proposes</a> cap-and-trade, too, and we haven't heard McCain say that he wants to tax your electric bill. These programs are designed to reduce carbon emissions by requiring companies to pay for pollution credits. Since most electricity in the U.S. is generated via coal and natural-gas plants, both carbon-emitting fossil fuels, a cap-and-trade program will result in higher electricity costs.<br /> <br /> </span>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Overheated Claims</span></span></span></strong><br /></div>
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /> Contrary to the ad's claim, Obama has not proposed raising taxes on home heating oil. In fact, just the opposite. Obama is proposing rebate checks of up to $500 per individual or $1,000 per family for what he calls an "<a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/newenergy_more#relief">emergency energy rebate</a>." Obama <a href="http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_emergencyeconplan.html">says</a> the rebate would be large enough that a typical family in a northern state could offset the full increase in home heating costs that have resulted from rising oil prices. Obama plans to fund the rebate through a five-year windfall profits tax on oil companies.<br /> <br /> The McCain-Palin campaign counters that a windfall profits tax on oil companies will raise the cost of heating oil. The campaign points to a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/05/AR2008080502927_pf.html"><em>Washington Post</em> editorial</a> which charges that the cost of the five-year tax:<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><br /> </span></span>
<blockquote><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><strong>Washington Post (Aug. 6):</strong> would be passed along in forgone investment in new production, lower dividends for pension funds and other shareholders, and higher prices at the pump&nbsp;&ndash; thus socking it to the consumers whom the plan is supposed to help.</span></span><br /></blockquote>
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-size: small;">This is a fairly standard view in economics. Corporations don't really pay taxes. Any taxes levied on a corporation are passed along to one of three places: shareholders, in the form of smaller dividends on their investments; employees, in the form of lower wages; and consumers, in the form of higher prices. The McCain-Palin campaign's argument is that increasing taxes on oil companies amounts to increasing the price of heating oil and that that increase really is just a tax being levied on home heating oil. But the tax could also fall mainly on the stockholders of the oil companies, in the form of reduced after-tax profits, dividends and stock prices. That is actually how both the Congressional Budget Office and the independent, nonpartisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center allocate the benefits of tax changes on corporations.<br /> <br /> We'll leave it to you to decide whether or not a windfall profits tax on oil companies makes economic sense. But it is misleading to describe Obama's view as a <em>tax </em>on home heating oil when Obama is actually proposing a rebate for home heating costs and a tax increase for oil companies.<br /> <br /> </span> </span></span>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Life Savings</span></span></span></strong><br /></div>
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /> The ad's claim that Obama will raise taxes on your "life savings" is only true if you're an individual making more than $200,000 (or a couple earning more than $250,000) and paying capital gains and dividend taxes. </span><span style="font-size: small;">(We've said <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/more_tax_deceptions.html">this many times now</a>.)</span><span style="font-size: small;"> The "ad facts" that the McCain campaign released to reporters state very prominently that "Barack Obama would raise capital gains and dividend taxes" and that 26.7 million Americans received capital gains income while 31.5 million received dividend income. That's all true. But the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121374794468982701.html">very article that the campaign cites</a> to support its claim also says quite clearly that Obama will raise capital gains and dividend taxes only on couples making more than $250,000 per year. We'd also note that more than 80 percent of all capital gains income in 2006 went to those earning more than $200,000 a year. See <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/would_raising_the_capital_gains_tax_rate.html">our Ask FactCheck</a> on the subject for more.<br /> <br /> </span>
<div><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: medium;">McCain's Magic 8 Ball</span></span></strong></span><br /></div>
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /> The ad says sweepingly that "we would pay" the increased taxes, even though what Obama has proposed would produce tax cuts, not tax increases, for about 80 percent of all workers and families and about 95 percent of those with children, according to independent analysis by the Tax Policy Center. To justify its claim that "we" would pay, the McCain campaign is making a new argument. In an <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/News/PressReleases/9003be98-5be2-404b-8f7c-97e7b9ac0aae.htm">"ad facts" document</a>, it cites two opinion columns which argue that Obama's new spending proposals would require him to break his pledge, and to raise taxes on couples making less than $250,000 per year. That's a prediction, which the McCain campaign states as fact in its ad. Viewers are given no indication that the ad is based on opinion about what could happen in the future. <br /> <br /> It's certainly true that Obama's proposed spending is higher than his projected revenues, and Obama has made no secret of the fact that his plan will not result in balanced budgets for the next four years. According to the Tax Policy Center, without spending cuts elsewhere, Obama's proposals could increase the projected debt to <a href="http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/411749_updated_candidates.pdf">$5.9 trillion</a> over 10 years. The McCain-Palin campaign is certainly entitled to argue that that level of debt is unsustainable and that Obama would therefore have to raise taxes.<br /> <br /> That, however, is a dangerous argument. The same Tax Policy Center analysis shows that McCain's proposals could raise the debt to <a href="http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/411749_updated_candidates.pdf">$7.4 trillion</a> over 10 years. And while McCain has promised to balance the budget by 2013, the Tax Policy Center notes that doing so would require a 25 percent reduction in federal spending. Few economists outside the McCain-Palin campaign think that is a feasible goal. So, by the ad's logic, Obama could just as easily claim that McCain supports a massive tax increase. But if he did he would have no more justification than McCain does for this ad.<br /> <br /> In fact, it's impossible to know for certain what either candidate will actually do if elected. Both sides are free to speculate. But unless they possess really good Magic 8 Balls, they are not free to present those speculations as settled facts. <br /> <br /> <em>Correction, Sept. 18:&nbsp; As originally posted we said Obama's proposed spending is lower than projected revenues, when we meant to say higher. <br /> <br /> Correction, Oct. 1: In our original story, we incorrectly reported that according to the Tax Policy Center "Obama's proposals could lead to between $3.6 trillion and $5.9 trillion in new debt over 10 years" and that "McCain's proposals would raise the debt by between $5.1 trillion and $7.4 trillion over 10 years." We misread the report. In fact, the TPC found that Obama's proposals could increase the projected baseline debt by an additional $3.6 trillion to a total of $5.9 trillion. Similarly, McCain's proposals could raise the baseline debt by an additional $5.1 trillion to a total of $7.4 trillion. Thanks go to an astute reader who pointed out the error.<br /> </em> <br /> <em>&ndash; by Joe Miller</em><br /> </span></div>
<div class="article_section_header"><span>Sources</span></div>
<div class="article_section"><span style="font-family: Courier New;">"<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/05/AR2008080502927_pf.html">Tapping Tired Wells</a>." <em>Washington Post</em>. 6 August 2008.</span><br /> <br /> <span style="font-family: Courier New;">Herman, Tom, "<a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/online.wsj.com/article/SB121374794468982701.html">Your Tax Bill: How McCain, Obama Differ</a>." <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>. 18 June 2008.<br /> <br /> </span><span style="font-family: Courier New;">"<a href="http://www.johnmccain.com//Informing/Issues/17671aa4-2fe8-4008-859f-0ef1468e96f4.htm">The Lexington Project: Breaking Our Dependence on Foreign Oil.</a>" 2008. JohnMcCain.com. 30 July 2008.<br /> <br /> </span><span style="font-family: Courier New;"><a href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_bills&amp;docid=f:s139is.txt.pdf">S.139: The Climate Stewardship Act of 2003.</a> 9 January 2003. 30 July 2008.<br /> <br /> </span><span style="font-family: Courier New;">Guerra, Carlos. "<a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/MYSA021908_ObamaQnA_e-n_c1d9803_html19832.html">Q&amp;A With Sen. Barack Obama.</a>" 19 February 2008. The San Antonio News-Express. 30 July 2008.</span><br /> <br /> <span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: x-small;">Burman, Len, et. al. &ldquo;<a href="http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=411749">An Updated Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates&rsquo; Tax Plans: Revised August 15, 2008</a>.&rdquo; Tax Policy Center, 15 Aug. 2008.</span></span></div>
<div class="article_section_header"><span>Related Articles</span></div>
<div class="article_section">
<div class="related_header"><span><a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/a_new_stitch_in_a_bad_pattern.html">A New Stitch in a Bad Pattern</a></span></div>
<div class="related_subheader"><span>A McCain ad wrongly claims Obama plans "painful tax increases" for working families. And who's talking about deficits?</span></div>
<div class="related_header"><span><a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/more_tax_deceptions.html">More Tax Deceptions</a></span></div>
<div class="related_subheader"><span>McCain misrepresents Obama's tax proposals again. And again, and again.</span></div>
</div>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/980898/</link>
			<media:title type="html">-McCain Lies exposed-</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/980898/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;article_header&quot;&gt;Once again, false attacks against parts of Obamas proposed Econimic Plan are done by both Palin and McCain in their respective debates and campaigns.&amp;nbsp; It's almost becoming more predictable then Palins Barbie smile when talking about the War in Iraq.&amp;nbsp; So, I found this article and posted it here.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_header&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_header&quot;&gt;The Following article is from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/there_he_goes_again.html&quot;&gt;Factcheck.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_header&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_header&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_header&quot; style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;There He Goes Again&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_date&quot; style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;September 18, 2008&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_subheader&quot; style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_subheader&quot; style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;McCain ad misrepresents Obama's tax plan. Again.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_section_header&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_section_header&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_section_header&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_section_header&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;Summary&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_section_header&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_section&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;The McCain-Palin campaign has released a new ad that once again distorts Obama's tax plans.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt; 
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;The ad claims Obama will raise taxes on electricity. He hasn't proposed any such tax. Obama does support a cap-and-trade policy that would raise the costs of electricity, but so does McCain.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;It falsely claims he would tax home heating oil. Actually, Obama proposed a rebate of up to $1,000 per family to defray increased heating oil costs, funded by what he calls a windfall profits tax on oil companies.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;The ad claims that Obama will tax &quot;life savings.&quot; In fact, he would increase capital gains and dividends taxes only for couples earning more than $250,000 per year, or singles making $200,000. For the rest, taxes on investments would remain unchanged.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;The McCain campaign argues in its documentation for this ad that, whatever Obama says he would do, he will eventually be forced to break his promise and raise taxes more broadly to pay for his promised spending programs. That's an opinion they are certainly entitled to express, and to argue for. But their ad doesn't do that. Instead, it simply presents the McCain camp's opinion as a fact, and it fails to alert viewers that its claims are based on what the campaign thinks might happen in the future.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_section_header&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Analysis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_section&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;In what has become an ongoing theme, the McCain-Palin campaign has released yet another ad that makes false claims about Barack Obama's tax plan. The ad, which was released on Sept. 18 and which the campaign says will air nationally, claims that Obama will raise income taxes and will tax &quot;life savings, electricity and home heating oil.&quot; As we keep saying, Obama says he'll raise income taxes and capital gains taxes only for couples earning more than $250,000 per year or singles making over $200,000. He has proposed no plans to raise taxes on either home heating oil or electricity.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;Electric Charges&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;font-size: x-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;FloatingBoxLeftLightGreen&quot;&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; color: #800000;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Verdana; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;McCain-Palin 2008 Ad:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #800000;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; color: #800000;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Verdana; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;&quot;Dome&quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;img src=&quot;http://cdn.factcheck.org/imagefiles/2008_9_18_McCain_Dome/Dome04-tn.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;175&quot; height=&quot;118&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Narrator:&lt;/strong&gt; When our economy's in crisis, a big government casts a big shadow on us all.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Obama and his liberal Congressional allies want a massive government, billions in spending increases, wasteful pork.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; And, we would pay -- painful income taxes, skyrocketing taxes on life savings, electricity and home heating oil.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Can your family afford that?&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;McCain: &lt;/strong&gt;I'm John McCain and I approve this message.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
The ad opens with standard-issue Republican warnings of the economic dangers of big government before proclaiming that Obama and his liberal allies want to bring back &quot;a massive government&quot; complete with billions in spending increases and waste. We are then told that Obama would raise income taxes and would increase taxes on &quot;life savings, electricity and home heating oil.&quot;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; This isn't the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obamas_celebrity_cred.html&quot;&gt;first time&lt;/a&gt; the McCain-Palin campaign has claimed that Obama would raise taxes on electricity. The claim is just as false now as it was when it first came up. The campaign bases its charge on a single comment Obama made in an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/MYSA021908_ObamaQnA_e-n_c1d9803_html19832.html&quot;&gt;interview&lt;/a&gt; with a San Antonio columnist. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;Obama did in fact say, &quot;What we ought to tax is dirty energy, like coal and, to a lesser extent, natural gas.&quot; But, as we said then, the comment is grossly out of context. Obama's remark comes after he was asked whether we ought to tax renewable energy sources. This was not a general call for increasing taxes on coal or natural gas, and Obama certainly does not have any such proposal as part of his public platform.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; One could argue that Obama's proposed cap-and-trade program constitutes an indirect tax on electricity. But McCain &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnmccain.com//Informing/Issues/17671aa4-2fe8-4008-859f-0ef1468e96f4.htm&quot;&gt;proposes&lt;/a&gt; cap-and-trade, too, and we haven't heard McCain say that he wants to tax your electric bill. These programs are designed to reduce carbon emissions by requiring companies to pay for pollution credits. Since most electricity in the U.S. is generated via coal and natural-gas plants, both carbon-emitting fossil fuels, a cap-and-trade program will result in higher electricity costs.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;Overheated Claims&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Contrary to the ad's claim, Obama has not proposed raising taxes on home heating oil. In fact, just the opposite. Obama is proposing rebate checks of up to $500 per individual or $1,000 per family for what he calls an &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/newenergy_more#relief&quot;&gt;emergency energy rebate&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; Obama &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_emergencyeconplan.html&quot;&gt;says&lt;/a&gt; the rebate would be large enough that a typical family in a northern state could offset the full increase in home heating costs that have resulted from rising oil prices. Obama plans to fund the rebate through a five-year windfall profits tax on oil companies.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; The McCain-Palin campaign counters that a windfall profits tax on oil companies will raise the cost of heating oil. The campaign points to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/05/AR2008080502927_pf.html&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Washington Post&lt;/em&gt; editorial&lt;/a&gt; which charges that the cost of the five-year tax:&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Washington Post (Aug. 6):&lt;/strong&gt; would be passed along in forgone investment in new production, lower dividends for pension funds and other shareholders, and higher prices at the pump&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; thus socking it to the consumers whom the plan is supposed to help.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;This is a fairly standard view in economics. Corporations don't really pay taxes. Any taxes levied on a corporation are passed along to one of three places: shareholders, in the form of smaller dividends on their investments; employees, in the form of lower wages; and consumers, in the form of higher prices. The McCain-Palin campaign's argument is that increasing taxes on oil companies amounts to increasing the price of heating oil and that that increase really is just a tax being levied on home heating oil. But the tax could also fall mainly on the stockholders of the oil companies, in the form of reduced after-tax profits, dividends and stock prices. That is actually how both the Congressional Budget Office and the independent, nonpartisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center allocate the benefits of tax changes on corporations.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; We'll leave it to you to decide whether or not a windfall profits tax on oil companies makes economic sense. But it is misleading to describe Obama's view as a &lt;em&gt;tax &lt;/em&gt;on home heating oil when Obama is actually proposing a rebate for home heating costs and a tax increase for oil companies.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;Life Savings&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt; The ad's claim that Obama will raise taxes on your &quot;life savings&quot; is only true if you're an individual making more than $200,000 (or a couple earning more than $250,000) and paying capital gains and dividend taxes. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;(We've said &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/more_tax_deceptions.html&quot;&gt;this many times now&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt; The &quot;ad facts&quot; that the McCain campaign released to reporters state very prominently that &quot;Barack Obama would raise capital gains and dividend taxes&quot; and that 26.7 million Americans received capital gains income while 31.5 million received dividend income. That's all true. But the &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121374794468982701.html&quot;&gt;very article that the campaign cites&lt;/a&gt; to support its claim also says quite clearly that Obama will raise capital gains and dividend taxes only on couples making more than $250,000 per year. We'd also note that more than 80 percent of all capital gains income in 2006 went to those earning more than $200,000 a year. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/would_raising_the_capital_gains_tax_rate.html&quot;&gt;our Ask FactCheck&lt;/a&gt; on the subject for more.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;McCain's Magic 8 Ball&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt; The ad says sweepingly that &quot;we would pay&quot; the increased taxes, even though what Obama has proposed would produce tax cuts, not tax increases, for about 80 percent of all workers and families and about 95 percent of those with children, according to independent analysis by the Tax Policy Center. To justify its claim that &quot;we&quot; would pay, the McCain campaign is making a new argument. In an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/News/PressReleases/9003be98-5be2-404b-8f7c-97e7b9ac0aae.htm&quot;&gt;&quot;ad facts&quot; document&lt;/a&gt;, it cites two opinion columns which argue that Obama's new spending proposals would require him to break his pledge, and to raise taxes on couples making less than $250,000 per year. That's a prediction, which the McCain campaign states as fact in its ad. Viewers are given no indication that the ad is based on opinion about what could happen in the future. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; It's certainly true that Obama's proposed spending is higher than his projected revenues, and Obama has made no secret of the fact that his plan will not result in balanced budgets for the next four years. According to the Tax Policy Center, without spending cuts elsewhere, Obama's proposals could increase the projected debt to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/411749_updated_candidates.pdf&quot;&gt;$5.9 trillion&lt;/a&gt; over 10 years. The McCain-Palin campaign is certainly entitled to argue that that level of debt is unsustainable and that Obama would therefore have to raise taxes.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; That, however, is a dangerous argument. The same Tax Policy Center analysis shows that McCain's proposals could raise the debt to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/411749_updated_candidates.pdf&quot;&gt;$7.4 trillion&lt;/a&gt; over 10 years. And while McCain has promised to balance the budget by 2013, the Tax Policy Center notes that doing so would require a 25 percent reduction in federal spending. Few economists outside the McCain-Palin campaign think that is a feasible goal. So, by the ad's logic, Obama could just as easily claim that McCain supports a massive tax increase. But if he did he would have no more justification than McCain does for this ad.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; In fact, it's impossible to know for certain what either candidate will actually do if elected. Both sides are free to speculate. But unless they possess really good Magic 8 Balls, they are not free to present those speculations as settled facts. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;em&gt;Correction, Sept. 18:&amp;nbsp; As originally posted we said Obama's proposed spending is lower than projected revenues, when we meant to say higher. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Correction, Oct. 1: In our original story, we incorrectly reported that according to the Tax Policy Center &quot;Obama's proposals could lead to between $3.6 trillion and $5.9 trillion in new debt over 10 years&quot; and that &quot;McCain's proposals would raise the debt by between $5.1 trillion and $7.4 trillion over 10 years.&quot; We misread the report. In fact, the TPC found that Obama's proposals could increase the projected baseline debt by an additional $3.6 trillion to a total of $5.9 trillion. Similarly, McCain's proposals could raise the baseline debt by an additional $5.1 trillion to a total of $7.4 trillion. Thanks go to an astute reader who pointed out the error.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/em&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;em&gt;&amp;ndash; by Joe Miller&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_section_header&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Sources&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_section&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Courier New;&quot;&gt;&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/05/AR2008080502927_pf.html&quot;&gt;Tapping Tired Wells&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; &lt;em&gt;Washington Post&lt;/em&gt;. 6 August 2008.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Courier New;&quot;&gt;Herman, Tom, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/online.wsj.com/article/SB121374794468982701.html&quot;&gt;Your Tax Bill: How McCain, Obama Differ&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; &lt;em&gt;The Wall Street Journal&lt;/em&gt;. 18 June 2008.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Courier New;&quot;&gt;&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnmccain.com//Informing/Issues/17671aa4-2fe8-4008-859f-0ef1468e96f4.htm&quot;&gt;The Lexington Project: Breaking Our Dependence on Foreign Oil.&lt;/a&gt;&quot; 2008. JohnMcCain.com. 30 July 2008.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Courier New;&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_bills&amp;amp;docid=f:s139is.txt.pdf&quot;&gt;S.139: The Climate Stewardship Act of 2003.&lt;/a&gt; 9 January 2003. 30 July 2008.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Courier New;&quot;&gt;Guerra, Carlos. &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/MYSA021908_ObamaQnA_e-n_c1d9803_html19832.html&quot;&gt;Q&amp;amp;A With Sen. Barack Obama.&lt;/a&gt;&quot; 19 February 2008. The San Antonio News-Express. 30 July 2008.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Courier New; font-size: x-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Courier New; font-size: x-small;&quot;&gt;Burman, Len, et. al. &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=411749&quot;&gt;An Updated Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates&amp;rsquo; Tax Plans: Revised August 15, 2008&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;rdquo; Tax Policy Center, 15 Aug. 2008.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_section_header&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Related Articles&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;article_section&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;related_header&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/a_new_stitch_in_a_bad_pattern.html&quot;&gt;A New Stitch in a Bad Pattern&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;related_subheader&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;A McCain ad wrongly claims Obama plans &quot;painful tax increases&quot; for working families. And who's talking about deficits?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;related_header&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/more_tax_deceptions.html&quot;&gt;More Tax Deceptions&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;related_subheader&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;McCain misrepresents Obama's tax proposals again. And again, and again.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>967317</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:55:57 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				In response to &quot;Why I'm Voting Democrat&quot;			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/967317/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-09-28 21:55:57<br />
							<p><strong>For those of you who have not seen this load of horseshit, and I'm sure most of you have, there is a copy and Paste list of sarcastic attacks against the Democratic party.&nbsp; Though political satire is an American Tradition, most of this crap doesn't even have any basis in reality.&nbsp; So, I'm posting my responses to debunk these assumptions followed by my own opinion... and with some sources.</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>I'm voting Democrat because English has no place being the official language in America.</em></span></p>
<p>1.) The debate over making English the Official language has nothing to do with either political party, as neither of them have taken it as a party platform.</p>
<p><strong>My Opinion-</strong>&nbsp; I would LOVE to see the official language of America be English, as it is the tongue of both Science and Trade, as well as the main language for about three quarters of the population.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>I'm voting Democrat because I'd rather pay $4 for a gallon of gas than allow drilling for oil off the coasts of America.</em></span></p>
<p>2.)&nbsp; It seems to me the only people pushing this forward are Oil manufacturing companies, and those who would benefit directly from it (Such as massive campaign contributions), not that it matters, since even if we did start the operations, it wouldn't even lower the prices on Gasoline (In the last 8 years, the number of offshore drilling permits given annually more then tripled even as the gas prices climbed).&nbsp; There is no Correlation between Gas prices and the amount of platforms we have in operation.</p>
<p><strong>My opinion-</strong> Opening all the regulations will only result in a ton of money being wasted on platforms for temporary usage with NO drop in gasoline prices.&nbsp; And even if were able to lower the price of gasoline by a whole dollar (Which of course would not happen), I would hardly consider it worth the cost in all the tax incentives that would have to be given as well as costs in infrastructure and support, not even to mention the terrible cost it would be to the environment.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>I'm voting Democrat because I think the government will do a better job of spending my money than I could.</em></span></p>
<p>3.) We have had a completely Republican controlled Administration for six years, with an additional 2 years of having lost ONLY the house of representatives, yet we have been plunged to almost 10 Trillion dollars in debt after Clinton left office (President Bill Clinton was able to pay off the national debt.)&nbsp; Guess who has to pay that 10 trillion dollars back?&nbsp; We do, through taxes.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>My opinion-</strong> Both parties spend, they want your money, so they can push forward actions that will get them reelected.&nbsp; The question is, how and for what the money is spent towards.&nbsp; I would rather have Universal Health care or opening of more public schools, then have it spent on a never-ending conflict.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>I'm voting Democrat because when we pull out of Afghanistan and Iraq, I know the Islamic terrorists will stop trying to kill us because they'll think we're a good and decent country.</em></span></p>
<p>Because apparently throwing out military into the middle of a Vietnam-like conflict&nbsp; in Iraq (Which as a sovereign nation under the Dictator Hussein, did not support the 9/11 terrorists and in fact, at times helped American Forces locate would be Islamic extremists.) is going to stop someone from grabbing a pair of box cutters and getting on a plane again.&nbsp; Al-Quida has cells throughout the much of the world, such as Thailand and Pakistan, wonder when we will invade them too.</p>
<p><strong>My opinion-</strong> I don't like going to war period, but at least their was justification with Afghanistan, but there was no reason for Iraq (And there still haven't been any).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>I'm voting Democrat because I believe people who can't tell us if it will rain in two or three days, can now tell us the polar ice caps will disappear in ten years if I don't start riding a bicycle, build a windmill or inflate my tires to proper levels.</em></span></p>
<p>Though many republicans are staunch opponents to even the NOTION of global warming, about one half of republicans agree (Though that is slowly dividing over partisan lines)&nbsp; with the 80% of democrats that there has been a continual rise in the earths tempature, and that steps can be taken to help stop this trend from blowing out of proportion, of course, many republicans discount that it is directly Humanities fault, but I would hardly call this a Democrat dominated subject.</p>
<p><strong>My opinion-</strong> Normal weather and global trends happen, it wasn't long ago that the earth had suffered a terrible (And relativly short) Ice Age.&nbsp; However, no matter how you justify it, throwing up billions of tons of chemicals and carbon into the air, where it hadn't been before, is bound to have some kind of effect.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><br />I'm voting Democrat because it's alright to kill millions of babies as long as we keep violent, convicted murderers on death row alive</em></span></p>
<p>Because apparently murder isn't murder if we want the person to die.</p>
<p><strong>M</strong><strong>y Opinion-</strong> I'm all for capital punishment, I think its fucking great!&nbsp; I want to lower the requirements to be put to death and reduce some of the roadblocks that extend a stay on death row by years.&nbsp; However, I'm still for Legalized abortion and it seems the only justification for removing it has been religiously based arguments.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>I'm a Liberal by the way... the kind that pissed off drunk rednecks think would be great to tie to the back of their chevy or ford and be dragged by my Socialist ankles. I'm done filling the challenge of Analysing this peice of crap copy and paste list, if you disagree... well, I'm not an expert, nor do I expect you to suddenly think I'm one.&nbsp; I'm just wanting to see if you would see through the bullshit of these "Why I'm Voting Democrat" lists.&nbsp; </strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Oh, here are a couple of those sources I promised.&nbsp; Now obviously its over the internet, but then I'm sure about half of the Republicans would still disagree with and attempt to discount Jesus if he came down and slapped them in their faces.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11397.html">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11397.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://brillig.com/debt_clock/">http://brillig.com/debt_clock/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://people-press.org/report/417/a-deeper-partisan-divide-over-global-warming">http://people-press.org/report/417/a-deeper-partisan-divide-over-global-warming </a></p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/967317/</link>
			<media:title type="html">In response to &quot;Why I'm Voting Democrat&quot;</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/967317/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;For those of you who have not seen this load of horseshit, and I'm sure most of you have, there is a copy and Paste list of sarcastic attacks against the Democratic party.&amp;nbsp; Though political satire is an American Tradition, most of this crap doesn't even have any basis in reality.&amp;nbsp; So, I'm posting my responses to debunk these assumptions followed by my own opinion... and with some sources.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;I'm voting Democrat because English has no place being the official language in America.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1.) The debate over making English the Official language has nothing to do with either political party, as neither of them have taken it as a party platform.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My Opinion-&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; I would LOVE to see the official language of America be English, as it is the tongue of both Science and Trade, as well as the main language for about three quarters of the population.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;I'm voting Democrat because I'd rather pay $4 for a gallon of gas than allow drilling for oil off the coasts of America.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2.)&amp;nbsp; It seems to me the only people pushing this forward are Oil manufacturing companies, and those who would benefit directly from it (Such as massive campaign contributions), not that it matters, since even if we did start the operations, it wouldn't even lower the prices on Gasoline (In the last 8 years, the number of offshore drilling permits given annually more then tripled even as the gas prices climbed).&amp;nbsp; There is no Correlation between Gas prices and the amount of platforms we have in operation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My opinion-&lt;/strong&gt; Opening all the regulations will only result in a ton of money being wasted on platforms for temporary usage with NO drop in gasoline prices.&amp;nbsp; And even if were able to lower the price of gasoline by a whole dollar (Which of course would not happen), I would hardly consider it worth the cost in all the tax incentives that would have to be given as well as costs in infrastructure and support, not even to mention the terrible cost it would be to the environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;I'm voting Democrat because I think the government will do a better job of spending my money than I could.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3.) We have had a completely Republican controlled Administration for six years, with an additional 2 years of having lost ONLY the house of representatives, yet we have been plunged to almost 10 Trillion dollars in debt after Clinton left office (President Bill Clinton was able to pay off the national debt.)&amp;nbsp; Guess who has to pay that 10 trillion dollars back?&amp;nbsp; We do, through taxes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My opinion-&lt;/strong&gt; Both parties spend, they want your money, so they can push forward actions that will get them reelected.&amp;nbsp; The question is, how and for what the money is spent towards.&amp;nbsp; I would rather have Universal Health care or opening of more public schools, then have it spent on a never-ending conflict.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;I'm voting Democrat because when we pull out of Afghanistan and Iraq, I know the Islamic terrorists will stop trying to kill us because they'll think we're a good and decent country.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because apparently throwing out military into the middle of a Vietnam-like conflict&amp;nbsp; in Iraq (Which as a sovereign nation under the Dictator Hussein, did not support the 9/11 terrorists and in fact, at times helped American Forces locate would be Islamic extremists.) is going to stop someone from grabbing a pair of box cutters and getting on a plane again.&amp;nbsp; Al-Quida has cells throughout the much of the world, such as Thailand and Pakistan, wonder when we will invade them too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My opinion-&lt;/strong&gt; I don't like going to war period, but at least their was justification with Afghanistan, but there was no reason for Iraq (And there still haven't been any).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;I'm voting Democrat because I believe people who can't tell us if it will rain in two or three days, can now tell us the polar ice caps will disappear in ten years if I don't start riding a bicycle, build a windmill or inflate my tires to proper levels.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Though many republicans are staunch opponents to even the NOTION of global warming, about one half of republicans agree (Though that is slowly dividing over partisan lines)&amp;nbsp; with the 80% of democrats that there has been a continual rise in the earths tempature, and that steps can be taken to help stop this trend from blowing out of proportion, of course, many republicans discount that it is directly Humanities fault, but I would hardly call this a Democrat dominated subject.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My opinion-&lt;/strong&gt; Normal weather and global trends happen, it wasn't long ago that the earth had suffered a terrible (And relativly short) Ice Age.&amp;nbsp; However, no matter how you justify it, throwing up billions of tons of chemicals and carbon into the air, where it hadn't been before, is bound to have some kind of effect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm voting Democrat because it's alright to kill millions of babies as long as we keep violent, convicted murderers on death row alive&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because apparently murder isn't murder if we want the person to die.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;M&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;y Opinion-&lt;/strong&gt; I'm all for capital punishment, I think its fucking great!&amp;nbsp; I want to lower the requirements to be put to death and reduce some of the roadblocks that extend a stay on death row by years.&amp;nbsp; However, I'm still for Legalized abortion and it seems the only justification for removing it has been religiously based arguments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I'm a Liberal by the way... the kind that pissed off drunk rednecks think would be great to tie to the back of their chevy or ford and be dragged by my Socialist ankles. I'm done filling the challenge of Analysing this peice of crap copy and paste list, if you disagree... well, I'm not an expert, nor do I expect you to suddenly think I'm one.&amp;nbsp; I'm just wanting to see if you would see through the bullshit of these &quot;Why I'm Voting Democrat&quot; lists.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh, here are a couple of those sources I promised.&amp;nbsp; Now obviously its over the internet, but then I'm sure about half of the Republicans would still disagree with and attempt to discount Jesus if he came down and slapped them in their faces.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11397.html&quot;&gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11397.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://brillig.com/debt_clock/&quot;&gt;http://brillig.com/debt_clock/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://people-press.org/report/417/a-deeper-partisan-divide-over-global-warming&quot;&gt;http://people-press.org/report/417/a-deeper-partisan-divide-over-global-warming &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>963694</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:05:52 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				A Hypothetical Question...			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/963694/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-09-26 21:05:52<br />
							<p>Seeing as people try to use the potential idea of his Death as a deterrent for voting for McCain, as well as people on the other side of the fence speak of the Potential of Obama getting assassinated...&nbsp; Here is a quick Quick question for that hypothetical Situation.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If Both Obama and McCain were for some reason Die before the elections took place, (Lets say a Bomb from a radical domestic Anarchist Terrorist organization blew up underneath the Debating Platform) and they were replaced by their Running Mates who then continued the campaign for their respective parties...</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Who would you vote for in that situation?&nbsp; And if you were to change your vote, why?</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Palin or Biden? </strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/963694/</link>
			<media:title type="html">A Hypothetical Question...</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/963694/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seeing as people try to use the potential idea of his Death as a deterrent for voting for McCain, as well as people on the other side of the fence speak of the Potential of Obama getting assassinated...&amp;nbsp; Here is a quick Quick question for that hypothetical Situation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Both Obama and McCain were for some reason Die before the elections took place, (Lets say a Bomb from a radical domestic Anarchist Terrorist organization blew up underneath the Debating Platform) and they were replaced by their Running Mates who then continued the campaign for their respective parties...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Who would you vote for in that situation?&amp;nbsp; And if you were to change your vote, why?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Palin or Biden? &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>954002</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:05:13 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				-Sorting through 10 Weeks of Features-			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/954002/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-09-22 02:05:13<br />
							<p>Well, this is probably the lowest I will ever drop on this site, but I decided to run a little test and find out what exactly the ratios were for Feature distribution on Ebaumsworld.&nbsp; Needless to say, I was not surprised by my findings.&nbsp; (This is pretty fucking lame I know.)&nbsp; I stoped at the "Rainbow Road Feature" (Which was featured by Ebaum).&nbsp; This was done by me, rkuzdas... Because I'm pathetic.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I'll let you make your own Conclusions or comments on this.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Starting From 12:01 AM on Monday, Sept 22nd, 2008</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The Master-</strong></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Ebaum- <strong>104 Features</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Total:</strong></span> 104 Features</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Percentage: Exactly <strong>one Third or 33%</strong> of features.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The Privileged-</strong></span> <em>(4 or more features within 10 weeks)</em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">axp090909- <strong>9 Features</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Rico232- <strong>7 Features</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Godlovesdemeter- 6</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jackizdikov- 6</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">kb2o- 6<span>&nbsp; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">McJugga- 6</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">ShellyDazzler- 6 <span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Baddozer- 5</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Bengoldsberry- 5</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">DatelineNBC- 5</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Fetismo- 5<span>&nbsp; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mikemisat- 5 <span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">CarGirl- 4</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">HandCannon- 4</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">L_o_L- 4</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Ttbardj- 4</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">williamross7- 4</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Total:</strong></span> 91 Features, 17 users.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Percentage:</strong></span> 29% of Total</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The Lucky</strong></span>- <em>(2-3 Features within 10 Weeks)</em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">AngiePie- 3</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Beeftrain- 3</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Busdriverwillie-3</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Filltime- 3</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jonlajoie- 3</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mynaimeisnobody- 3</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">1d3n717y- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Baller07- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cookies654- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">davidspates- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">DreaD08- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Edbassmaster- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">EggOnlyEgg- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Eliteneo- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">FnCranks- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Fndfilms- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">h4z4rd- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">hockyplaya6787- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">illville502- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">lorddread- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Ohmyfreekinggod- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">rp08- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">SirJuanito- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">star4ucker- 2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">YouFeelMe-2</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Total:</strong></span> 56 Features, 25 users.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Percentage:</strong></span> 18% of Total</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The Flukes</strong></span>- <em>(All of the following received 1 Feature within 10 Weeks)</em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">bigperm423, dude42, kcbigmac, dan, MobiJokes, bluffho, icy_g, actionjack, MethMinute, themarkofvayne, strober, BarelyPolitical, Jezebeth, SeanReevesDude, dannyboy425, fyucouch, freshsquilla, bdsakx, iknowTHEfuture, dt1021, mayoj1, FnCranks, (rkuzdas wrote this list), 1994300ex, NationalLampoon, kcbigmack, agtx, the, Eastside_Dave, mrhahn530, shays1786, ENWILSON, Lynnalicious, tortuga420, xzero777x, dogfoodfilms, blackmanisgod, mikeyp, chicka_7, YankeesSuck1, jball003, itsbulmer, saneenough, EBHD, studmuffin75, Hoitachi, skatesnow67, DannyMendlow, Mantis3, hobbes141, dan_richard13, CopDetectives, ChuckNasty, SecretPants, imwithstupid794, HoldenCaulfield, TheMadKnight, Rattlesnake93, afafa, Disturbed01, Shelobe, k2skater69</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Total:</strong></span> 61, 61 users.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Percentage:</strong></span> 20% of total.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Grand Total:</strong></span> 312 Features, 105 users.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Percentage:</strong></span> 100%</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So yeah... thats it.&nbsp; Rip into me, I deserve it.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/954002/</link>
			<media:title type="html">-Sorting through 10 Weeks of Features-</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/954002/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;Well, this is probably the lowest I will ever drop on this site, but I decided to run a little test and find out what exactly the ratios were for Feature distribution on Ebaumsworld.&amp;nbsp; Needless to say, I was not surprised by my findings.&amp;nbsp; (This is pretty fucking lame I know.)&amp;nbsp; I stoped at the &quot;Rainbow Road Feature&quot; (Which was featured by Ebaum).&amp;nbsp; This was done by me, rkuzdas... Because I'm pathetic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'll let you make your own Conclusions or comments on this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Starting From 12:01 AM on Monday, Sept 22nd, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Master-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Ebaum- &lt;strong&gt;104 Features&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Total:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; 104 Features&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Percentage: Exactly &lt;strong&gt;one Third or 33%&lt;/strong&gt; of features.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Privileged-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;em&gt;(4 or more features within 10 weeks)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;axp090909- &lt;strong&gt;9 Features&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Rico232- &lt;strong&gt;7 Features&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Godlovesdemeter- 6&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Jackizdikov- 6&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;kb2o- 6&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;McJugga- 6&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;ShellyDazzler- 6 &lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Baddozer- 5&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Bengoldsberry- 5&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;DatelineNBC- 5&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Fetismo- 5&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Mikemisat- 5 &lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;CarGirl- 4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;HandCannon- 4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;L_o_L- 4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Ttbardj- 4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;williamross7- 4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Total:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; 91 Features, 17 users.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Percentage:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; 29% of Total&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Lucky&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;- &lt;em&gt;(2-3 Features within 10 Weeks)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;AngiePie- 3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Beeftrain- 3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Busdriverwillie-3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Filltime- 3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Jonlajoie- 3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Mynaimeisnobody- 3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;1d3n717y- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Baller07- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;cookies654- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;davidspates- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;DreaD08- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Edbassmaster- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;EggOnlyEgg- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Eliteneo- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;FnCranks- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Fndfilms- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;h4z4rd- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;hockyplaya6787- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;illville502- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;lorddread- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Ohmyfreekinggod- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;rp08- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;SirJuanito- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;star4ucker- 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;YouFeelMe-2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Total:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; 56 Features, 25 users.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Percentage:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; 18% of Total&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Flukes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;- &lt;em&gt;(All of the following received 1 Feature within 10 Weeks)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;bigperm423, dude42, kcbigmac, dan, MobiJokes, bluffho, icy_g, actionjack, MethMinute, themarkofvayne, strober, BarelyPolitical, Jezebeth, SeanReevesDude, dannyboy425, fyucouch, freshsquilla, bdsakx, iknowTHEfuture, dt1021, mayoj1, FnCranks, (rkuzdas wrote this list), 1994300ex, NationalLampoon, kcbigmack, agtx, the, Eastside_Dave, mrhahn530, shays1786, ENWILSON, Lynnalicious, tortuga420, xzero777x, dogfoodfilms, blackmanisgod, mikeyp, chicka_7, YankeesSuck1, jball003, itsbulmer, saneenough, EBHD, studmuffin75, Hoitachi, skatesnow67, DannyMendlow, Mantis3, hobbes141, dan_richard13, CopDetectives, ChuckNasty, SecretPants, imwithstupid794, HoldenCaulfield, TheMadKnight, Rattlesnake93, afafa, Disturbed01, Shelobe, k2skater69&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Total:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; 61, 61 users.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Percentage:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; 20% of total.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Grand Total:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; 312 Features, 105 users.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Percentage:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; 100%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;So yeah... thats it.&amp;nbsp; Rip into me, I deserve it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>952441</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 02:47:08 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				The Serious questions of life.			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/952441/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-09-21 02:47:08<br />
							<p>So yeah, I just got back from a party which had a keg of Spotted cow... And as the discussions got more intellectual as the hours drove on and more was consumed, we came to a couple choice questions that dominated the evening for short intervals.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>1.) Would you let a leprechaun rape you in the ass if it meant that you would shit gold for a week?&nbsp; And if so, would you do your best to eat as much ex lax and bran muffins as possible?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>2.) Back before the civil war, if the wife of a slave owner had sex with one of the slaves... was it considered bestiality?&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>3.) Do you think opening your own abortion clinic in your basement, using rusty coat hangers and ziplock bags would be a good way to make money?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>And as a side note... I'm half drunk and even I can use the fucking spellchecker.</p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/952441/</link>
			<media:title type="html">The Serious questions of life.</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/952441/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;So yeah, I just got back from a party which had a keg of Spotted cow... And as the discussions got more intellectual as the hours drove on and more was consumed, we came to a couple choice questions that dominated the evening for short intervals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1.) Would you let a leprechaun rape you in the ass if it meant that you would shit gold for a week?&amp;nbsp; And if so, would you do your best to eat as much ex lax and bran muffins as possible?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2.) Back before the civil war, if the wife of a slave owner had sex with one of the slaves... was it considered bestiality?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3.) Do you think opening your own abortion clinic in your basement, using rusty coat hangers and ziplock bags would be a good way to make money?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And as a side note... I'm half drunk and even I can use the fucking spellchecker.&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>952190</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 22:22:43 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				Gems found in the Urban Dictionary			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/952190/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-09-20 22:22:43<br />
							<p>Since my success in finding that post on Creeping Jennie, I decided to go ahead and search for other gems within Urbandictionary.com, here are a couple that I would like to share with all you wonderful people.&nbsp; (Just kidding, I fucking hate you all.)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Cracka-</strong></span></p>
<table id="entries" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<tr>
<td class="text" colspan="2">
<div class="definition">A defamatory statement from the 1970s, primarily used for caucasion males.  See also <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=honkey">honkey</a> and <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=jive%20turkey">jive turkey</a>.</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>"That cracka stole my pinto while I was getting my food stamps and welfare!"</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jesus-</strong></span></p>
<p>The Dude who mows my lawn.</p>
<p><em>"Jesus, you missed a spot."</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Michael Jackson- </strong></span></p>
<table id="entries" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<tr>
<td class="text" colspan="2">
<div class="definition">The process in which a black man becomes a white woman.</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>"Michael Jackson went through a Michael Jackson"</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Wigger</strong></span></p>
<p>A dopey suburban white guy who tries to act black, to great comic effect for everyone else. <br /> <br />One who should be discriminated against when trying to gain entry to clubs, restaurants, etc., rather than actual African-Americans.</p>
<p><em>"Who let all these ridiculous wiggers in here? Oh well, at least they're good for a laugh." </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>ebaumsworld </strong></span></p>
<table id="entries" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<tr>
<td class="text" colspan="2">
<div class="definition">A place full of stolen media with ebaumsworld.com plastered all over it</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>"There is no God, because Eric Bauman hasn't been sued to hell yet." </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Sarah Palin </strong></span></p>
<p>Heinous bitch who only got elected because she sucked McCain's dick.</p>
<p><em>"That fatherfucker is such a Sarah Palin that I bet she gets it on with politicians to save face. Or to moisturize face." </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Grenade </strong></span></p>
<table id="entries" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<tr>
<td class="text" colspan="2">
<div class="definition">The solitary ugly girl always found with a group of hotties. If the grenade doesn't get any action, then neither does anyone else.</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>"Come on man, take one for the team and jump the grenade" </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Earth</strong></span></p>
<p>Mostly harmless.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jesusland</strong></span></p>
<table id="entries" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td class="text" colspan="2">
<div class="definition">The magical North American Christian theocracy whose citizenry have given <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=George%20Bush">George Bush</a> a second term in office not because of his "accomplishments", but because of his blatant religious fundamentalism and exaggerated 1950s-era "family values." It is bordered by the <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Blue%20States">Blue States</a> and <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Canada">Canada</a> to the west, north, and northeast; Mexico to the south, and the Atlantic to the east.</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>"In Jesusland, "family values" and religious beliefs are the only things considered when voting for President. Even if the candidate is a corrupt scumbag with one hand in the oil industry's pants and the other shoving a dildo up the collective ass of the middle-class." </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Owned </strong></span></p>
<p>An overused gamerboy term. Using this term is now considered the most potent contraceptive available. Anyone saying this is guaranteed not to get any.</p>
<p><em>Everyone and his brother has uploaded a picture for "Owned", although no one cares about it and no one will see it. </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Eric bauman </strong></span></p>
<table id="entries" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<tr>
<td class="text" colspan="2">
<div class="definition">A crooked bastard who owns ebaum's world and makes millions off of stolen flash games and short cartoons. Sites like albino blacksheep, something awful, and YTMND have joined forces to try and get his site erased. He's also hated by 99 out of 100 people.</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>"eric bauman=gayest faggot in the world" </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>These were all real submissions... so yeah, I'm sick of copy paste lists, and would rather see REAL ORIGIONAL Material.&nbsp; <em>(Is that so fucking hard to ask)</em></p>
<table id="entries" style="height: 31px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="44">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="word"></td>
<td id="tools_33062" class="tools"><span class="status"><strong></strong></a><strong></strong></a></span><span class="thumbs"></span> <span class="favorite"></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td class="text" colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/952190/</link>
			<media:title type="html">Gems found in the Urban Dictionary</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/952190/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;Since my success in finding that post on Creeping Jennie, I decided to go ahead and search for other gems within Urbandictionary.com, here are a couple that I would like to share with all you wonderful people.&amp;nbsp; (Just kidding, I fucking hate you all.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cracka-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table id=&quot;entries&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;text&quot; colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;definition&quot;&gt;A defamatory statement from the 1970s, primarily used for caucasion males.  See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=honkey&quot;&gt;honkey&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=jive%20turkey&quot;&gt;jive turkey&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;That cracka stole my pinto while I was getting my food stamps and welfare!&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Jesus-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Dude who mows my lawn.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;Jesus, you missed a spot.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Michael Jackson- &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table id=&quot;entries&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;text&quot; colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;definition&quot;&gt;The process in which a black man becomes a white woman.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;Michael Jackson went through a Michael Jackson&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Wigger&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A dopey suburban white guy who tries to act black, to great comic effect for everyone else. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;One who should be discriminated against when trying to gain entry to clubs, restaurants, etc., rather than actual African-Americans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;Who let all these ridiculous wiggers in here? Oh well, at least they're good for a laugh.&quot; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ebaumsworld &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table id=&quot;entries&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;text&quot; colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;definition&quot;&gt;A place full of stolen media with ebaumsworld.com plastered all over it&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;There is no God, because Eric Bauman hasn't been sued to hell yet.&quot; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sarah Palin &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Heinous bitch who only got elected because she sucked McCain's dick.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;That fatherfucker is such a Sarah Palin that I bet she gets it on with politicians to save face. Or to moisturize face.&quot; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Grenade &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table id=&quot;entries&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;text&quot; colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;definition&quot;&gt;The solitary ugly girl always found with a group of hotties. If the grenade doesn't get any action, then neither does anyone else.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;Come on man, take one for the team and jump the grenade&quot; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Earth&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mostly harmless.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Jesusland&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table id=&quot;entries&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;text&quot; colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;definition&quot;&gt;The magical North American Christian theocracy whose citizenry have given &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=George%20Bush&quot;&gt;George Bush&lt;/a&gt; a second term in office not because of his &quot;accomplishments&quot;, but because of his blatant religious fundamentalism and exaggerated 1950s-era &quot;family values.&quot; It is bordered by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Blue%20States&quot;&gt;Blue States&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Canada&quot;&gt;Canada&lt;/a&gt; to the west, north, and northeast; Mexico to the south, and the Atlantic to the east.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;In Jesusland, &quot;family values&quot; and religious beliefs are the only things considered when voting for President. Even if the candidate is a corrupt scumbag with one hand in the oil industry's pants and the other shoving a dildo up the collective ass of the middle-class.&quot; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Owned &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An overused gamerboy term. Using this term is now considered the most potent contraceptive available. Anyone saying this is guaranteed not to get any.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Everyone and his brother has uploaded a picture for &quot;Owned&quot;, although no one cares about it and no one will see it. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Eric bauman &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table id=&quot;entries&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;text&quot; colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;definition&quot;&gt;A crooked bastard who owns ebaum's world and makes millions off of stolen flash games and short cartoons. Sites like albino blacksheep, something awful, and YTMND have joined forces to try and get his site erased. He's also hated by 99 out of 100 people.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;eric bauman=gayest faggot in the world&quot; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These were all real submissions... so yeah, I'm sick of copy paste lists, and would rather see REAL ORIGIONAL Material.&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;(Is that so fucking hard to ask)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table id=&quot;entries&quot; style=&quot;height: 31px;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;44&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;word&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td id=&quot;tools_33062&quot; class=&quot;tools&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;status&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;thumbs&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class=&quot;favorite&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;text&quot; colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>951873</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:14:50 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				Messages to Angiepie- In response to Ellimems Blog			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/951873/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-09-20 20:14:50<br />
							<p>Well I stand corrected, Ellimems blog wasn't deleted (But I'm sure it will be soon), so since many of you DID see Ellimems blog, he asked us to post our messages to Angiepie, so here is mine.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Here is what I sent to that good ole Slutmotron. Angiepie.</strong></p>
<p>"Though I fucking hate Ellimem, this was pretty fucking low. Why don't you actually go out and find or make something Original, instead of stealing shit<br /> from someone already on this site.</p>
<p>You are a Slut. Plan and simple. I'm just wondering howmany balls you had to marinate in your mouth to get this one ok'ed by the ebaums staff."</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>She responded</strong></p>
<p>"he stole from me faggot"</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>So, I resent her the message she sent in response to WhyNot, and added a little something at the end.</strong></p>
<p>(<em>From Angie to WhyNot, but resent to her by me</em>)</p>
<p>"I'll admit it, but I dont have to cause everyone (but you) already knows it, they just dont care because that is what ebaums world is, an open domain for people to post what they find on the internet and bring it here for this community to enjoy, what you are accusing me of isn't any different than saying " admit it, you got those fries from<br /> Mcdonalds" my response is the same - Sooooooo! Whhaaaaaat! thats what every single<br /> other feature on this site is, snatched from the web, its open domain. bother me later when you have something significant to say. this is the biggest waste of my and your time yet!"&nbsp; (<em></em><em>My additional response</em>) "Wow... so not only are you a slut, but you're a<br /> Lieing bitch too."</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I haven't gotten a response yet...</p>
<p>But I'm eagerly awaiting one...</p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/951873/</link>
			<media:title type="html">Messages to Angiepie- In response to Ellimems Blog</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/951873/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221905087.jpg" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;Well I stand corrected, Ellimems blog wasn't deleted (But I'm sure it will be soon), so since many of you DID see Ellimems blog, he asked us to post our messages to Angiepie, so here is mine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Here is what I sent to that good ole Slutmotron. Angiepie.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Though I fucking hate Ellimem, this was pretty fucking low. Why don't you actually go out and find or make something Original, instead of stealing shit&lt;br /&gt; from someone already on this site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are a Slut. Plan and simple. I'm just wondering howmany balls you had to marinate in your mouth to get this one ok'ed by the ebaums staff.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;She responded&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;he stole from me faggot&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;So, I resent her the message she sent in response to WhyNot, and added a little something at the end.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(&lt;em&gt;From Angie to WhyNot, but resent to her by me&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;I'll admit it, but I dont have to cause everyone (but you) already knows it, they just dont care because that is what ebaums world is, an open domain for people to post what they find on the internet and bring it here for this community to enjoy, what you are accusing me of isn't any different than saying &quot; admit it, you got those fries from&lt;br /&gt; Mcdonalds&quot; my response is the same - Sooooooo! Whhaaaaaat! thats what every single&lt;br /&gt; other feature on this site is, snatched from the web, its open domain. bother me later when you have something significant to say. this is the biggest waste of my and your time yet!&quot;&amp;nbsp; (&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;My additional response&lt;/em&gt;) &quot;Wow... so not only are you a slut, but you're a&lt;br /&gt; Lieing bitch too.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I haven't gotten a response yet...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I'm eagerly awaiting one...&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>950853</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 04:15:15 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				Creeping Jennie- The Definition			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/950853/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221536930.gif" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-09-20 04:15:15<br />
							<p>Since I have no life, the moment I saw a refrence to Urban dictionary and a posting about everyones favorite nonsense driven shit-spewing Ex-Moderator.&nbsp; I just HAD to go look it up,</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I wasn't Dissapointed.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=creepingjennie">http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=creepingjennie</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I'm glad to see that exposure on this monstrosity is heading in the right direction.</p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/950853/</link>
			<media:title type="html">Creeping Jennie- The Definition</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/950853/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221536930.gif" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;Since I have no life, the moment I saw a refrence to Urban dictionary and a posting about everyones favorite nonsense driven shit-spewing Ex-Moderator.&amp;nbsp; I just HAD to go look it up,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wasn't Dissapointed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=creepingjennie&quot;&gt;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=creepingjennie&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm glad to see that exposure on this monstrosity is heading in the right direction.&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>946459</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:25:10 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				No such thing as Pro-McCain, just Anti-Obama			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/946459/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221536930.gif" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-09-17 23:25:10<br />
							<p>All I ever seem to read in the comments from aggressive conservatives is attacks against Obama, and several of them I actually agree with, but what I want to know is why do you support McCain?&nbsp; I would like to think that many of you go past the "Lesser of Two Evils Argument", but in all honesty, over the last couple weeks I haven't seen shit to make me believe you actually support your own Canidate.&nbsp; Heres a couple choice blogs I've seen from this area Denouncing Obama, without actually showing any real support for McCain or what he would do in the same situation.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>1.) (<em>My favorite</em>) <a href="../assh0le/view=941178">Obama is the Anti-Christ</a></p>
<p>2.) <a href="../schmokin/view=940217">Obama the Socialist hates Oil</a></p>
<p>3.) <a href="../beamer_guy_93/view=942709">Obama is a Flip-flop</a></p>
<p>4.) <a href="../shoprite/view=924062">Obama hates the Constitution</a></p>
<p>5.)<a href="../Ellimem/view=919164"> Obama is lieing to everyone</a></p>
<p>These are just blogs, some of my favorite attacks are done through the Comment section, but I'm sure you'll see a good half dozen below this blog, so I'll just let them reveal themselves.</p>
<p>Now I'll be fair, there are several blogs which show support for McCain, but usually its tied into arguments about "Unfair Attacks" from the Liberals in the Democratic party against their golden boy.&nbsp; Once again however, nothing is spoken about the Canidates policies.</p>
<p><strong>I challenge you</strong>, either in a Blog or through a comment below, to actually state- without attacking Obama, why you are voting for McCain.&nbsp; Or, if you HAVE to try and claw at a Nominee, I would like to see why you hate Biden.&nbsp; I'll repeat.&nbsp; Show me your reasons FOR McCain, and not AGAINST Obama.</p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/946459/</link>
			<media:title type="html">No such thing as Pro-McCain, just Anti-Obama</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/946459/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/rkuzdas/rkuzdas-1221536930.gif" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;All I ever seem to read in the comments from aggressive conservatives is attacks against Obama, and several of them I actually agree with, but what I want to know is why do you support McCain?&amp;nbsp; I would like to think that many of you go past the &quot;Lesser of Two Evils Argument&quot;, but in all honesty, over the last couple weeks I haven't seen shit to make me believe you actually support your own Canidate.&amp;nbsp; Heres a couple choice blogs I've seen from this area Denouncing Obama, without actually showing any real support for McCain or what he would do in the same situation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1.) (&lt;em&gt;My favorite&lt;/em&gt;) &lt;a href=&quot;../assh0le/view=941178&quot;&gt;Obama is the Anti-Christ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2.) &lt;a href=&quot;../schmokin/view=940217&quot;&gt;Obama the Socialist hates Oil&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3.) &lt;a href=&quot;../beamer_guy_93/view=942709&quot;&gt;Obama is a Flip-flop&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4.) &lt;a href=&quot;../shoprite/view=924062&quot;&gt;Obama hates the Constitution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5.)&lt;a href=&quot;../Ellimem/view=919164&quot;&gt; Obama is lieing to everyone&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are just blogs, some of my favorite attacks are done through the Comment section, but I'm sure you'll see a good half dozen below this blog, so I'll just let them reveal themselves.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now I'll be fair, there are several blogs which show support for McCain, but usually its tied into arguments about &quot;Unfair Attacks&quot; from the Liberals in the Democratic party against their golden boy.&amp;nbsp; Once again however, nothing is spoken about the Canidates policies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I challenge you&lt;/strong&gt;, either in a Blog or through a comment below, to actually state- without attacking Obama, why you are voting for McCain.&amp;nbsp; Or, if you HAVE to try and claw at a Nominee, I would like to see why you hate Biden.&amp;nbsp; I'll repeat.&amp;nbsp; Show me your reasons FOR McCain, and not AGAINST Obama.&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
				<item>
			<guid>939761</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:11:55 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>
				[Blog]
				A slut making the top of news during a Disaster			</title>
			<description>
				<![CDATA[
				<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" border="0">
					<tr>
						<td valign="top" width="120">
							<a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/939761/"><img src="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/picture/490689/939724.jpg" border="0" /></a>
						</td>
						<td valign="top">
							<strong>Added:</strong> 2008-09-15 02:11:55<br />
							<p>Am I the only one who is asking, "WHAT THE FUCKING HELL!?", when I uploaded Yahoo to do a search for the lyrics to the Morilla the Gorilla show?&nbsp; Is it just me, or does the vast majority of the United States have their heads up their Asses.&nbsp; We are in the middle of two wars, going through an National Election, and still suffering at the hand of Hurricane Ike, and this stupid bitch gets featured as a Top story because she has some heart-shaped ring on her finger!&nbsp; Fuck Lohan!&nbsp; Fuck Hilton! Fuck all the rest of those Lazy Spoiled sluts, I shouldn't have to see their faces every single time I turn on the damn computer!</p>
<p>Please, tell me if I am going nuts or not, because I feel like the rest of the world is fucking crazy.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Also, why the hell does the Word Array pop up in the Tags box whenever I start a new blog?</p>						</td>
					</tr>
				</table>
				]]>
			</description>
			<link>http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/939761/</link>
			<media:title type="html">A slut making the top of news during a Disaster</media:title>
			<media:content url="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/blogs/view/939761/" 
																									 lang="en" />
			<media:thumbnail url="http://media.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/picture/490689/939724.jpg" width="75" height="75" />						<media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;Am I the only one who is asking, &quot;WHAT THE FUCKING HELL!?&quot;, when I uploaded Yahoo to do a search for the lyrics to the Morilla the Gorilla show?&amp;nbsp; Is it just me, or does the vast majority of the United States have their heads up their Asses.&amp;nbsp; We are in the middle of two wars, going through an National Election, and still suffering at the hand of Hurricane Ike, and this stupid bitch gets featured as a Top story because she has some heart-shaped ring on her finger!&amp;nbsp; Fuck Lohan!&amp;nbsp; Fuck Hilton! Fuck all the rest of those Lazy Spoiled sluts, I shouldn't have to see their faces every single time I turn on the damn computer!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please, tell me if I am going nuts or not, because I feel like the rest of the world is fucking crazy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, why the hell does the Word Array pop up in the Tags box whenever I start a new blog?&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
					</item>
			</channel>
</rss>

