What happened to JFK in Dallas has been debated for decades, and at this point, it seems like we’ll never really know what went down. But for as long as there have been questions about the book depository and the grassy knoll, the CIA’s always been there to say that they had nothing to do with it.

But if that were true, it wouldn’t explain why they keep hiding key details about it. For example: why is there evidence that then-CIA director George H.W. Bush was in Dallas on the day of the attack? And why is the personal story of Lee Harvey Oswald so, well, weird?

The CIA has always been hesitant to talk about their connections with Oswald, and they’ve been repeatedly caught downplaying the relationship between him and the agency. Now, a whistleblower alleges that he caught the agency lying *again* about their relationship with Oswald — specifically during his time in Mexico City.

Despite claiming that they had basically zero photos of Oswald during this period, a whistleblower told Axios that the agency had around 2,300 photos from this time and that he personally saw a film canister labeled “Oswald in Mexico.”

This whistleblower also claimed that the report the agency gave Congress about Oswald’s time in Mexico was knowingly sanitized, with employees even bragging about how they got away with removing so much information. The purpose of this sanitization, the whistleblower said, was to stop further inquiries into what the agency might know about this strange period in American history.

So, does that mean the CIA had something to do with it? Err, no — at least, not directly. But if we’re going to be “releasing the files” soon, we might as well release these ones, too. Unless, of course, you guys have something to hide?