Disney’s ‘Frozen’ Conspiracy Is a Tough One to Swallow

1 - 10
11 - 15

Disney’s ‘Frozen’ Conspiracy Is a Tough One to Swallow

One film is a psychological thriller from the minds of Stephen King and Stanley Kubrick, while the other is a children's cartoon starring Idina Menzel. They are not the same.

By zachnading

Published 2 years ago in Creepy

One film is a psychological thriller from the minds of Stephen King and Stanley Kubrick, while the other is a children's cartoon starring Idina Menzel. They are not the same.

There may very well be striking similarities and themes such as winter and loneliness. However, to blogger MKHammer, Disney took quite a bit of inspiration from the horror film and here is her theory.

1
Firstly both films take place on a mountain. Fair. Here's Arendelle and the Overlook Hotel, respectively.

2
Elsa is Jack Torrance. Alright, dangerous main characters. A threat to their family. Sure.

3
Anna is Danny Torrance. Both are weird emo kids.

4
Play with toys on their own? I mean this is a stretch.

5
Both Anna and Danny have past injuries thanks to their family members. I can promise you, some things really are just coincidence.

6
The fact that these two are just goofy as hell, doesn't mean there is any other correlation.

7
Kristoff and Sven are Dick Hallorann and his snowcat.

8
Sven is a literal reindeer and a snowcat is a vehicle, but sure I guess I'll allow it.

9
For this theory to work we have to imagine Elsa hitting Kristoff with an axe.

10
I'm not saying there aren't eerie similarities...

11
But comparing Elsa's ice palace to the Gold Ballroom at the Overlook just isn't it.

12
Hans is Grady. Basically death and family and murder. Another stretch.

13
The escapes seem to fit the narrative. Both Danny and Anna leave through a window down an icy slope.

14
This one might be the only piece for me that holds any water.

15
But alas, Elsa sacrifices herself to save her sister. While Jack freezes to death after trying to murder his kid with an axe. I think we can call this one debunked.