The Obama Absurdtation
Letemdangle
Published
04/23/2012
Sorry for yet another Absurdtation, but I can't help it they fill the air like a thick fart.
From The Rose Garden on April 2 2012 Obama said, "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress."
WTF!!! He taught this shit as a University Professor? In fact it has happened 165 times. Kind of significant.
From The Constitution of the United StatesAnalysis and Interpretation, 2010
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CONAN-2010/pdf/GPO-CONAN-2010.pdf
Pg. 199
ACTS OF CONGRESS HELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITEDSTATES [This entry should follow # 121 in the main volume:] Act of February 7, 1972, Federal Election Campaign Act, (Pub. L.92-225, Title III, § 316, as added Pub.L. 94-283, Title I, § 112(2),90 Stat. 490, 2 U.S.C. § 441b).
Federal law prohibiting corporations from using their general treasury funds to make independent expenditures for an electioneering communication or for speech expressly advocating the election or defeat of a candidate is invalidated. Disclaimers indicating who is responsible for political advertising and requiring the disclosure of campaign information to the FEC are upheld.
Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. __, No. 08205, slip op. (2010) Justices concurring: Kennedy, Roberts, C.J., Scalia, Alito, Thomas. Justices dissenting: Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor. [These entries should follow # 158 in the main volume:] 159. Act of December 9, 1999 (Pub. L. 106-152, § 1(a), 113 Stat.1732, 18 U.S.C. § 48). Federal law which criminalized the commercial creation, sale, or possession of depictions of animal cruelty struck down. Despite an exemption for depictions with serious religious, political, scientific, educational, journalistic, historical, or artistic value, the law was found to reach protected First Amendment speech. United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. __, No. 08769, slip op (2010)Justices concurring: Roberts, C.J., Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas,Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor.Justices dissenting: Alito.
You forgot to give Clinton the memo
From The Rose Garden on April 2 2012 Obama said, "I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected congress."
WTF!!! He taught this shit as a University Professor? In fact it has happened 165 times. Kind of significant.
From The Constitution of the United StatesAnalysis and Interpretation, 2010
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CONAN-2010/pdf/GPO-CONAN-2010.pdf
Pg. 199
ACTS OF CONGRESS HELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITEDSTATES [This entry should follow # 121 in the main volume:] Act of February 7, 1972, Federal Election Campaign Act, (Pub. L.92-225, Title III, § 316, as added Pub.L. 94-283, Title I, § 112(2),90 Stat. 490, 2 U.S.C. § 441b).
Federal law prohibiting corporations from using their general treasury funds to make independent expenditures for an electioneering communication or for speech expressly advocating the election or defeat of a candidate is invalidated. Disclaimers indicating who is responsible for political advertising and requiring the disclosure of campaign information to the FEC are upheld.
Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. __, No. 08205, slip op. (2010) Justices concurring: Kennedy, Roberts, C.J., Scalia, Alito, Thomas. Justices dissenting: Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor. [These entries should follow # 158 in the main volume:] 159. Act of December 9, 1999 (Pub. L. 106-152, § 1(a), 113 Stat.1732, 18 U.S.C. § 48). Federal law which criminalized the commercial creation, sale, or possession of depictions of animal cruelty struck down. Despite an exemption for depictions with serious religious, political, scientific, educational, journalistic, historical, or artistic value, the law was found to reach protected First Amendment speech. United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. __, No. 08769, slip op (2010)Justices concurring: Roberts, C.J., Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas,Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor.Justices dissenting: Alito.
You forgot to give Clinton the memo
2 Comments